Richard Dawkins tackles the Bombardier Beetle
Top Comments
All Comments (502)
-
@fingleur1 Here are some of your gods: see if you can recognize any of them :( Big bang, Nothing exploded and everything come in to existence, live originated from non-leaving material, Billions of year’s egos, ones upon a time,) this aren’t facts they are just as religious as Satanism
-
@aurelama1 There are alternative God stories, there isn't an alternative to evolution - nothing else even starts to explain our observations.
Any claim you can make for your God I could make for any other God or any other made-up figment of anyone's imagination. Stories don't trump facts.
-
@MegaBlueZOMBIE Really!! Strong views there, you make Stalin or Ceausescu look like amateurs dictators …
-
@fingleur1 Anyone who examines closely the evidence for evolution accepts a Darwinian explanation.
Oh I see is like saying that 99% of those how examine closely the evidence for Creationism believe in God. Brilliant!!! Thanks I understand now
-
@aurelama1 If you don't agree with evolution and are doing something medicine related you should be kicked out of the school, and evolution has no correlation with atheism, every bishop and cardinal of the catholic church believes in evolution, even the pope believes in evolution, they just believe that God is responsible for it, creationists are just nuts, I can't respect them, I can respect other Christians beliefs, but anyone who takes the bible literally doesn't deserve respect
-
@MegaBlueZOMBIE I know how it works I have grown up and study in the communist Romania if you question Darwinism publicly than you are out of medical school in spite of your achievements or credentials so if you want to keep what you've got just play alone. Is just like the story about the emperor’s cloths ...I don’t see how the origins part of evolutionary theory believe will benefits in the modern day medical research is Just like saying that an atheist doctor is better than a religios one.
-
@aurelama1 Like 90% are.
-
@aurelama1 There are virtually no biologists who aren't 'Darwinians'
Sure there's the odd senile God Botherer here and there but for the most part anyone who examines closely the evidence for evolution accepts a Darwinian explanation.
-
@fingleur1 Hope you are not implying that all scientists are Darwinians believers.
-
@aurelama1 When it comes to developing antibiotics, genetically engineering crops to save lives, or understanding and treating cancer or hereditary diseases - there's only set of glasses that is any use - the ones belonging to scientists.
I wish I had had a teacher like Dawkins, especially dressed in such a fabulous shirt!
andrewnorris2 1 month ago 3