The Case of ESP - Ad Hominem Argument

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,065
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 8, 2008

A skep-dick can't produce any sound criticism of three parapsychologists experiment so he relies on attacking their character.
From "The Case of ESP"
Horizon
BBC 4
1983

  • likes, 7 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (wpaxton)

  • Can someone bring me up to speed? What was this experiment about and what are you actually arguing?

  • I answered these questions in four comments made in response to

    janwillem1982 . I direct you to those comments (below) for your answers.

  • It's still not clear to me what experiment has been done and it only explains that someone is falsely discrediting the experiment.

  • It is a remote viewing experiment conducted by Russell Targ and Harold Puthoff in the 1970s. If you would like to view the full 89 minute program it is linked below. Enjoy.

    vids(dot)myspace(dot)com/index­(dot)cfm?fuseaction=vids(dot)i­ndividual&videoid=34531657

  • Not an ad hominem attack. He was questioning how trustworthy the results of this dubious claim were. In that case, he is perfectly justified in bringing into question the character of someone who had a significant part in the orchestration of the "experiment."

  • Fuck the living shit out of you. People like you are a disgrace. You hide behind the banner of "science" but you're really insecure assholes who need to belittle others to feel like your life means something.

Video Responses

This video is a response to The Last Rainforest Trailer (2008)
see all

All Comments (13)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The argument was based on Dr. Tart's honesty as a researcher. That is an ad hominem argument.

  • No one can take these "skeptics" seriously. They don't investigate the paranormal they just ridicule it from a great distance. A typical ignorant behaviour which no reasonable person interested in the truth is allowed to accept.

    I should mention that I'm a skeptic too. But I won't reject true facts about parapsychology that have already been proven in several repeatable experiments. Remote Viewing is one of these proven facts.

  • thanks for this. Can you supply the rest of this episode of Horizon?

    Thanks.

    M

  • You've just betrayed yourself as a skep-dick for mentioning Randi in a serious manner. You've just been blocked. Thank you for showing you're overwhelming bias and antiscientific way of thinking.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more