Top Comments
All Comments (97)
-
Done make any more of these with stupid filler with the cat and dog thing. A waste of time. I have a beard and a cat and i thought you were actually going someplace with that and i wanted to hear facts.. but you give a stupid still of someone holding the cat to a picture. theres Nothing there, no reaction of the cat to the man and nothing to do with the beard. With fillers like this Improbable TV tanking and being scrapped on the cutting room floor - Probable.
-
I'd say that the canine reaction to the Mona Lisa was more favorable than the feline reaction to the bearded man.
-
am i supposed to be in some kind of drug to understand the video?
-
It is people who post max character comments like elbeatch, who make youtube a dumber place.
-
after he died they should have measured his nails to see if its true that your nails grow out when you die, or if the skin just recedes
-
seriously get a grip, although i enjoy short science snippets, i won't just watch anything. Stupid, don't lose your credibility as a science channel that already re-does other peoples footage and findings by trying to be gently funny.
I understand Improbable science is meant to be funny, but it's not. A dog looking at the Mona Lisa, oh oh no, that's hilarious. I didn't learn or laugh, shame.
We don't need more stupidity incorporated into already dumbed down science. Let's make people dumber?
-
what the hell is this about??
-
I watched twice to see if i was missing something. That is 6 minutes 40 seconds of my life I can never get back. Yo owe me 13 minutes 20seconds of decent entertainment,.. and u better make it pay!!
-
What the hell did I just watch?
-
Liszt - Hungarian Rhapsody
OK I AM NOT TRYING TO BE A JURK BUT THIS IS GETING VERY LAME why dont thay ever talk about anti matter or the string theory or quantum physics and stuff like that it would be much more better then this
antimoron08 3 years ago 6
I subscribed to NewScientist for news, not for bad jokes.
3kToT 3 years ago 6