Fossil Fuels vs Green Energy

When you go throughout your life, do you want a world with reddish black skies, with smokestacks going so high up you cant see them through the clouds of smog and waste everywhere? With the occasional cough or wheeze due to air pollution, slowly killing you?

Or.

A beautiful healthy world with blue skies, green grass, clear waters and all the wonders of nature? Its your choice. And thats why we are here to help you save the planet.

Did you know that the gas we use for our cars is running out?

And that if we keep using these fossil fuels, we are ruining the earth for future generations?

All of what we just said is true, but there is a way to prevent it.

What we have to say gives you tips to help the earth, not destroy it!

Instead of using cars that run on fossil fuels, some people have made a switch to vegetable oil. You heard us, vegetable oil. People do this by slightly modifying diesel cars, and going to restaurants asking the people who work there for their old vegetable oil. That way we are using our leftovers, not putting them to waste.

Also, people use what we call solar cars. These cars use energy from the sun to put power into the batteries that these cars need in order to move. Using the suns energy doesnt harm the earth at all, it makes it better by keeping the earth as it is, not making it worse.

For another kind of car, which runs on electricity. These cars use a battery, which powers the car like a toy R.C. automobile. So it doesnt use gas, and it doesnt pollute.

And the cars most people use today are ones that run on fossil fuels. These cars obviously use fossil fuels to work, and they produce CO2 mixed with gasoline, which makes smog. This smog is causing a hole in the ozone layer, which protects the earth from the full power of the sun. Without it, the earths climate would become hotter, giving serious burns and skin cancer.

So using the following facts we gave you about using green energy, try to help by buying one of those kind of cars that dont use fossil fuels when you are older, or right now!

Category:

Education

Tags:

• fossil
• fuels
• vs.
• green
• energy
• fleshman7063

[alive1919]

wich 1 is u????

[FleshMan7063]

camo sweater is FleshMan (Me), and the guy with short hair is TheFinnGuy (Holt).

[inkster69]

Wtf your clearly reading this shit

[FleshMan7063]

i thought we were writing it (dur)

[ghningaman]

You wig gas can suck my fucking nuts kill the fucking planet if we have to live here with you dumb FUCKS

[Cosmo1093]

@boarder355 Hm, I see you're really mature.

[S0CIALACTIVIZM]

@Cosmo1093 Hey, you said that the only 2 energy options that can provide sufficient power for the planet are fossil fuels and nuclear power. This is incorrect. Hydrogen power has the potential to power the entire planet. Check out my vid if you don't believe me. And it is not harmful to the environment at all. We just don't have the hydrogen infrastructure yet

[boarder355]

@Cosmo1093 yo mama kills birds

[Cosmo1093]

@boarder355 You said that Canada could set an example for developing countries, and over half of all their power comes from hydroelectric energy generation, and around 23% comes from coal and natural gas.

You do know how many wind farms would be required, right? And how many natural and economic resources would need to be devoted in order to create so many wind farms? Wind itself isn't even dependable, and the wind turbines are unsightly, noisy/annoying, and can easily kill birds.

[boarder355]

@Cosmo1093 I don't remember saying anything about hydroelectric energy but you can keep ranting if you want to. Wind only accounted for 2.3% but it has the potential to count for 100%

[Cosmo1093]

@boarder355 Wind power only accounted for 2.3% of the United State's energy generation... Canada? You mean how they use hydroelectricity generation? That's what China did with the Three Gorges Dam, and a lot of people were pissed off that cultures were lost and that over a million people were forced to relocate. I'm surprised you support hydroelectricity since it damages the surrounding ecosystems, both upstream and downstream.

[boarder355]

@Cosmo1093 Most of the things you are telling me, I already know. You are talking to an informed citizen. Actually we have ten times more than enough wind power avaliable to power the world. As for the developing countries, these things take time but in this time countries like canada can set the example for them. I don't really care what you say. Im only repling to humour myself.

[Cosmo1093]

@boarder355 Oh, and all the 1.5 billion cattle in the world are more damaging than all the 600 passenger vehicles in the world. The livestock industry of the world is about 1.33x more damaging than all the transportation on the planet. That doesn't even factor in gasses humans emit or that of the the wild animals or domesticated pets of the world.

And what do you say to developing countries? "Watch your emissions. You can't use fossil fuels, even if you can't afford nuclear power."?

[Cosmo1093]

@boarder355 Oh no, I'm destroying the planet. The only 2 energy options that can provide sufficient power for this planet are fossil fuels and nuclear power.

Only the (planned) electric $970k Ultimate Aero EV will have more power than a $380k Lamborghini. The only existing performance vehicle that uses renewable energy is the electric Tesla Roadster that starts at ~$130k..which can be demolished by $90k GTR's and $110k Corvette ZR-1's along with a plethora of considerably cheaper tuner cars.