u got 2 understand the s2000 was maxd out from the factry na so its head already has a race port an polish compared to the zed n also the cams have much higher lift an duration on them also to turbo the s2000 reliabily ul hav 2 spend a bit an if u spend that money on the zed then bye bye again s2000 an also you gotta remember if you wana level the field by puttin turbos on the honda then the field can be more leveled by putting higher duration cams on the zed with higher flowing heads etc
I would say piss weak... Yea a car that is 14 years newer and 500lbs lighter thats true. But the S also has 1L, 2 cyl, and 2 turbos less than the Z. If you put a turbo on the S(see my vids) its much more formitble of an opponet. PS. I love the Z's old and new and if the new 350's were turbo from the factory i would have probably got one of those over my s.
if they knew how to drive, they'd probly knew that spinning tires only makes u loose traction and speed, lol :D, that doesnt make u a good racer. learn how to race, people think that spining tires is cool but actually u loose speed that u could have obtain instead.
Piss weak? umm no it just beat a car that is about 500lbs lighter and 14-16 years newer STOCK. what does that say for honda's Golden Child? Not much. Also, the Z is one of the most capable performance platforms out there as far as simple bolt ons and hp/tq gains. If that Z was stage III(Intake,Exhaust, ECU=400-420hp) That Honduh wouldnt even be close enough to catch the dust its rear tires kicked up.
s2k launched WAY to high. I raced a 300 TT tonight and lost by half a car. its a great match up.
AJGoff52D10 8 months ago
Wow, you fail bro.
babymilo95 3 years ago
u got 2 understand the s2000 was maxd out from the factry na so its head already has a race port an polish compared to the zed n also the cams have much higher lift an duration on them also to turbo the s2000 reliabily ul hav 2 spend a bit an if u spend that money on the zed then bye bye again s2000 an also you gotta remember if you wana level the field by puttin turbos on the honda then the field can be more leveled by putting higher duration cams on the zed with higher flowing heads etc
slotank 3 years ago
I would say piss weak... Yea a car that is 14 years newer and 500lbs lighter thats true. But the S also has 1L, 2 cyl, and 2 turbos less than the Z. If you put a turbo on the S(see my vids) its much more formitble of an opponet. PS. I love the Z's old and new and if the new 350's were turbo from the factory i would have probably got one of those over my s.
TurboNFRStwoK 4 years ago
if they knew how to drive, they'd probly knew that spinning tires only makes u loose traction and speed, lol :D, that doesnt make u a good racer. learn how to race, people think that spining tires is cool but actually u loose speed that u could have obtain instead.
rx8beatu 4 years ago
yes honda noobs if only, if ONLY s2000 was <insert honda lover comment> it would beat Z sure... excuses ,excuses, those honda boys lol
z32na 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
HOnda s2000 balless (no torque). Pussy.
algomez2007 4 years ago
the s2000 spent way too much time wheelspinning. A better driver could make the race head to head
Shadowboost 5 years ago 2
Piss weak? umm no it just beat a car that is about 500lbs lighter and 14-16 years newer STOCK. what does that say for honda's Golden Child? Not much. Also, the Z is one of the most capable performance platforms out there as far as simple bolt ons and hp/tq gains. If that Z was stage III(Intake,Exhaust, ECU=400-420hp) That Honduh wouldnt even be close enough to catch the dust its rear tires kicked up.
cincyzx 5 years ago
3Z does not excist!
PijnigeR 5 years ago