Fulham V. Chelsea

After the final whistle. A view from the back of the Hammersmith End after Fulham beat Chelsea.

Category:

Sports

Tags:

• Football
• Soccer
• Fulham
• Chelsea
• fans
• pitch
• invasion

[ffcbetterthanrangers]

There's only one team in fulham

[petechett]

Fuck of CHELSEA!!

[whattheholf91]

Fuck off. Fulham are such a small club, they scrape a win against their bigger brother and suddenly think they're big time charlies. A few Fulham came onto the pitch and goaded the away end, of course Chelsea are gonna come and fucking do you. You're not our rivals, Fulham.

[viallimcbeal]

@h5standing How do you only have 5,000 glory hunters? Your average home gate has gone up 20,000 in 14 years. And 'post Abramovich'? The season before Abramovich arrived, Chelsea averaged 39,770.

[h5standing]

@viallimcbeal Our all time average attendance is 19,000 or so i say thats about fair, and means we only really got about 5000 glory hunters which is to be expected, considering our average attendance is 25000 and 3000 of those are away fans. And yeah i agree its pretty ironic but i think we sing it more to those who only supported chelsea post abramovich takeover not the ones who have been there for years

[viallimcbeal]

And the game against Cov in 94 had 8,923. Wimbledon averaged 8,405 for the whole of 92/93 (premier league era), so I fail to see how that is the 2nd lowest ever for a game. They must have hand a handful lower in that one season. No?

[viallimcbeal]

And 79-95 was Chelsea's lowest ever period for crowds. Before and since they have been healthy which is why Chelsea have the 5th highest average in England. Since the early 90's Chelsea's crowds have gone up by double, yes. But Fulham's have gone up 5 times, meaning percentage wise, there are more johnny-come-latelys at Fulham.

[viallimcbeal]

This is all irrelevant to my original point. Chelsea could have averaged 1,000 before recent successes.....I was merely pointing out that it was a bit rich for Fulham to sing "where were you when you were shit?" when they didn't average over 5,000 between 1986 and 1996 and most of the people at Craven Cottage now wouldn't know Jim Stannard if he broke into their house and shat on their carpet.

[FulhamsFinest1]

Also this guy in the video is a right queer. "I've never seen anything like this in my life"-fag.

[FulhamsFinest1]

Since 1979-95 you averaged between 13,000 to 25,000. In 1983 you got an average of 12,000. So I guess that is around 20,000 fans coming out nowhere for you than? That attendance was in Premier League history, so yes according to statistics you did have the second lowest attendance in Premier League history. Yes we have our fair share of johnny come latelys, but don't kid yourslef, you have got plenty of gloryhunters that have attached to your club since the money started pouring in.

[viallimcbeal]

@FulhamsFinest1 That's Chelsea's lowest ever Premier League attendance. You could hand pick the lowest crowd of every team for the last 18 years and it would be poor. How is that the second lowest ever anyway? Wimbledon got lower than that several times. The fact of the matter is that Chelsea have the 5th highest average home attendance since formation in English football. Fulham have summoned 20,000 fans out of nowhere in recent seasons and still have the cheek to sing that.

[FulhamsFinest1]

In 1994 you got the second lowest ever Premier League attendance against Coventry...around 7,000. Only 3,000 more than us when we were bottom of the lower leagues. Deluded fook.