To Labarum312 and Kevinanity: Jimmy Earl Carter vs. Barack Hussein Obama

Again, video response are preferred regarding the question on Obama and Carter. I will approve them as well, considering I'm asking for them. For Labarum312, I don't care if I have to wait till your done with your video series. For Kevinanity, I don't care if I have to wait till after a few videos. However, please answer as soon as you can.

Here's the HNN article: http://hnn.us/blogs/entries/132925.html

I also posted the following on my college's SMS's discussion forum, but nobody replied. So, let's see what you think. ;)

A question for those that lived during Carter's presidency:

There's been a few articles on the Tea Party movement and Obama which compare it to Jimmy Carter's presidency and the Founding Father's time (even one by Carter himself). Do you think that it is similar, and why? Also, what do you think about what these articles have to say?

http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/forum/2010-09-29-column29_ST_N.htm

http://www.tnr.com/blog/foreign-policy/77973/dinesh-dsouza-british-kenyan-ant...

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/24/opinion/24chernow.html?_r=1&pagewanted=...

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/248083/hoover-mcgovern-obama-dick-morris

I also found one more, though it's on a different subject:

http://www.theroot.com/views/what-history-actually-teaches-us-about-race?page...

In case you were wondering, yes, some of these are biased. But that isn't going to change your mind, right? ;)

Thanks ahead of time for replying. :)

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Obama
• Carter
• Kevinanity
• Labarum312
• Bart
• Misquoting
• Jesus

[jcrebel18]

@kevinanity

Thanks. ;)

[jcrebel18]

@kevinanity

I wasn't sure. I just took showers there.

Still, I think his definition of miracles is also crap, along with some other criticisms from the debates I've seen.

[kevinanity]

@jcrebel18 Moody is a fundy school.

[kevinanity]

So, basically what you're saying is that Albert and I are old :) I'll try to get a response up in the next few days.

[jcrebel18]

@Randomicity912

Well, he claims to be an agnostic, but I doubt with the emotional impact that he'll come back to the faith. He's also either dishonest or disingenuous, as in the debate with WLC, while mentioning that he went to Moody Bible Institute (which is in Chicago, a mostly liberal city, though Idk where Moody stands), I've heard he went to a liberal campus later (and one of his profs said something that shocked and deconverted him).

[Randomicity912]

Barth Ehrman is quite dishonest, in that he leaves a lot out. He also mkaes things out to be worse than they are. He suffers from former fundy syndrome, in that he used to believe that the Bible contained the exact words of Jesus and was handed to humans by God and all that, and because he found out that that wasn't the case, he deconverted and seems to think that this is a problem, when it isn't.