911 Eyewitness - Huge steel sections ejected more than 600 f
Loading...
Loading...
2:17
911 Eyewitness - FEMA report shows seismic evidence of contrby truebluestar1,340 views- 2:07
911 Eyewitness - The path of ejected debris points to an offby truebluestar5,735 views
- 1:32
911 Eyewitness - Intense heat and bright flashes indicate nuby truebluestar20,913 views
- 1:45
911 Eyewitness - Pyroclastic Flow was a telltale sign of conby truebluestar26,559 views
- 1:22
911 Eyewitness - Freefall speed collapse of the North Towerby truebluestar9,414 views
- 2:22
911 Eyewitness - Victim standing near impact zone debris proby truebluestar3,181 views
- 1:17
911 Eyewitness - Witnesses reported rumbling and dust cloudsby truebluestar7,849 views
- 2:13
911 Eyewitness - North Tower transmission tower leads the coby truebluestar17,160 views
- 1:27
911 Eyewitness - Evidence of thermonuclear explosionsby truebluestar38,953 views
- 0:35
911 Eyewitness - A closer look at the debris left by the colby truebluestar2,635 views
- 0:28
Bent WTC steel indicates high temperaturesby Shoestring9111,971 views
- 2:10
911 Eyewitness - Evidence of controlled demolition 30 floorsby truebluestar47,311 views
- 6:11
WTC Impact Model - MITby psikeyhackr10,174 views
- 2:07
911 Eyewitness - Review of the scientific principles involveby truebluestar23,952 views
- 3:30
Physicist Challenges the Official 911 Storyby sdlhsn183,707 views
- 2:02
911 Eyewitness - Experiment shows that WTC Bldg. 7 fell at fby truebluestar1,930 views
- 2:02
911 Eyewitness - NOVA broadcast complicit in official fraudby truebluestar14,814 views
- 1:23
911 Eyewitness - Detonation zone visible in video below theby truebluestar38,234 views
- 0:59
Lateral Ejections Without Explosives!by TheNMSR275 views
- 0:38
China Steel Structure, hollow sections, , H-Beam, Color Metaby zzllrr4,651 views
I just have eyes that can see! LOL!!!
GGcaptmandrake 1 year ago
You are just as screwed as the medias want you to be...
alienspacecentereast 1 year ago
Idiot, you can´t process even simple basic observations, you are too stupid to understand anything...
alienspacecentereast 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
LOL!!! #1) The green line super-imposed over the site photo, includes the profile angle of the building! This video, is an outright hoax! This is why the truth movement, is in such pitiful decline!
The line extends past the claimed distance!
#2) He asks "Where did the enrgy needed come from to eject the several hundred tons of steel over to the rooftop of the Winter Garden?" It's called compression! It occurs when the larger of any object(s) get's squeezed out of an area that is too small!
GGcaptmandrake 2 years ago
Magic Arabs. lol
ColonelAllan 3 years ago
When your assumptions about how planes fly mandate that every time a 767 takes off at its minimum take off speed, it defies the laws of physics, you may want to rethink those assumptions. And next time, before you blindly follow the conspiracy rantings of an 'aeronautics engineer'....you may want to actually check if he IS an aeronautics engineers. And not a software engineer. Ignore as you will. Your willful ignorance doesn't establish anyone's conspiracy.
palescottsman 4 years ago
Oh right, I am going to listen to someone who knows so much about physics he can't figure out that skyscrapers have more steel toward the bottom.
You hadn't presented your clear demonstration of lack of physics comprehension. Excuse me if you aren't as important to me as you think. LOL
The Empire State Building was constructed before the first jet plane flew so I'm not about to pay attention to what YOU say about jet planes.
psikeyhackr 4 years ago
A month? You waited a MONTH, you blundered completely on your 'aeronautics engineer who turned out to be a SOFTWARE engineer, you blundered on your '4 times the air resistance' claim that wouldn't even allow the plane in question to take off, and that was the best you could come up with? You're harmless, friend.
palescottsman 4 years ago
Tell people that you couldn't figure out that the steel got thicker toward the bottom of the WTC so they will be aware of your vast understanding of PHYSICS.
psikeyhackr 4 years ago
Think this through logically. The minimum take off speed of a 767 is 160mph. If 585mph represents the maximum thrust its engines can produce, and every time the air density is doubled, its thrust is halved, then a 767 would be absolutely INCAPABLE of meeting its minimum take off speed at sea level....per your assumptions . (585mph/4 =146.mph). You may want to rethink what the SOFTWARE engineer says on this issue.
palescottsman 4 years ago