Tommy Nelson Song of Solomon

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
26,757
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 25, 2009

more info? www.songofsolomon.com

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (39)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • South Africa prohibited this phrase for years & sourced it as sexual material

  • @MrsAshDash WHERE!!??? thats all im asking WHERE IS YOUR SOURCE! You stated, " My personal study has also shown that due to the graphic phrasing of this book, Hebrew boys were not permitted to read this book until a certain age" WHY IS THIS TRUE? WHY DO YOU BELIEVE THESE WORDS? WHAT BROUGHT YOU TO THAT CONCLUSION ??? Please write back with "I beleive that Jewish boys were not allowed to read this book until a certain age because ___" Fill in the blank! Please dont respoond with "Tommy said..."

  • gee....does this mean i have to repeat everything....i was appealing to the intellectual element of our discussion!! Malice? LOL!! i am a polemist. i may not be what you are used to ... when someone says the bible says " " "...if i object...i object strong. I want my position to be strong. so again. you are saying that everyone before 1961 was wrong and in gay marriage/pro abortion/pornolozza/licencious America is right. i care to differ. You see how i am...there is an issue. My Points R strong.

  • @StLukey7 I have no objection to myself, you, or anyone else teaching God's Word to their kids. i think it's absolutely necessary. I am sad to say that your malice in your responses does not seem to indicate that you know the same God I do. As I said earlier, I am happy to hear a differing point of view, and if I am mistaken I am happy to admit it. However, if you are not capable of speaking the truth in love, I don't see how these repeated posts do much good. You are in my prayers.

  • look up how charles haddon spurgeon interpreted this text....lets follow a scholars view since tommy nelson quotes spurgeon so much!

  • @MrsAshDash ARE YOU SAYING THE INTENDED CONTEXT IS ONLY UNDERSTOOD IN OUR ERA? & Campbell, Zwingli, Scofield, Stowe, Luther, Wycliff, , Augustine, Whitefield, Finney, Edwards, Eusebius, Anslem, Molina, Francis Xavier, Loyola, Anthony of Padua, Wilberforce, Barth, Cooney, Irvine, Govan, Allis, Ramsey, Wilson, Bresee, Simpson, Tyndale, Wesley, Moody & Taylor WERE WRONG? & Counseling Major, who doesnt know Hebrew, Tommy Nelson is RIGHT?! God Bless him. he's agreat worker. He's not a Bible scholar.

  • @MrsAshDash "my personal study" thats the problem. Rabbi Michael Schobeck (look him up if you like) told me personally that they teach this to their children. All you have done is say, "I think!! I think!!" YOU ARE NOT CITING ANYTHING! & Yes id teach God's word this to my kids, 1 of the reason they kicked the bible out of school is because of u folks! If ur asked 'how do you know boys werent allowed to read this? would answer.."oh i heard it somewhere" -you like taking peoples word for it I see!

  • @StLukey7 ... My personal study has also shown that due to the graphic phrasing of this book, Hebrew boys were not permitted to read this book until a certain age, not that they were not allowed to study it at all. (Would you want your seven-year-old to read this? It's not kid-friendly stuff.) Please do not make derogetory comments about how much you think I may or may not have studied. If you see an error, speak the truth in love and kindly point me to a resource with correct information.

  • @StLukey7 Please do not misunderstand me - I never once said or implied that God is a pervert. He created sex and the human body; it is we flawed humans who have created something perverted by taking it out of its intended context. I personally do not believe that this book calls for allegorization, which is a conclusion I have come to based on my own personal study. If you disagree that is perfectly okay...

  • @StLukey7 oh i took the other point off....hahahaha , i went over the limit of characters. the other point would have been that there are no Old Testament hebrew scholars who back up the points literalists make on the SOng of Songs. because in order to have a case the literealist have to change the word of God. they take a scissor and take an eraser and change the words around.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more