#11 Laws of Nature 3: Mathematical Nature
Loading...
Loading...
9:04
#9 Laws of Nature 1: Historyby dfpolis736 views- 6:39
#12 Laws of Nature 4: Universalityby dfpolis138 views
- 6:54
#10 Laws of Nature 2: Immaterialityby dfpolis155 views
- 9:20
#23 The Mind: Complex Physics?by dfpolis661 views
- 5:11
#13 Laws of Nature 5: Causalityby dfpolis590 views
- 5:25
#14 Laws of Nature 6: Intentionalityby dfpolis500 views
- 9:37
Laws of nature point to God (part 1)by CreationistsWON7,278 views
- 10:00
What are Dimensions?by AlienScientist149,241 views
- 1:38:09
David Gross: The Coming Revolutions in Theoretical Physicsby UCBerkeleyEvents56,469 views
- 12:57
Sun Tzus The Art Of War History Channel (Part 1)by offline93310,324 views
- 13:46
# 1.1 Introduction - Remasteredby dfpolis210 views
- 11:18
Nature of Reality & Existence. What's behind the illusion?by iawabraxas12,053 views
- 7:36
#19 Targets In Evolution Part 2by dfpolis249 views
- 9:47
The Art of War PART 1by TitusLabienus269,388 views
- 8:18
#21 The Two Subsystem Mindby dfpolis856 views
- 5:54
Terrorist attacks backed up by mathematical laws - RT 100105by cctvupload93 views
- 48:39
"Two Minds the Physics of Aristotle and Newton"by greenfieldcc456 views
- 7:24
Nature of Mathematics - And the Trouble with the Golden Ratioby SethwardProductions2,801 views
- 12:57
Sun Tzus The Art Of War History Channel (Part 2)by offline9336,674 views
- 4:53
The so-called laws of nature, Part III. Ear Massage Percussion Quartetby earmassagequartet4,305 views
@kvash3154 I think human philosophy must deal with human experience. What cannot be distinguished in human experience (including mystical and religious experience), has no meaning to humans. Until recently, we had no means of deciding what was moving uniformly & what was absolutely at rest. So the difference was meaningless to us. Now, with the delayed arrival of high energy gamma rays, it appears we do have a means of deciding what is at rest. So relativity is breaking down. Peace, DP
dfpolis 4 months ago
I'm reading a book from Dr. W. L. Craig about time and God. In it he points out that Einstein's interpretation is a philosophical one, based on verificationism. Hendrik Lorentz was one who first did the math, but had a interpretation that had absolute space and time. It seems that both interpretations us the same math and empirical data, I was wandering if you had some insight or even option on it, and that you might share it? Thanks for your time.
kvash3154 5 months ago
True, as long as they are in the same frame of reference. Peace, Dennis
dfpolis 5 months ago