september fail
Uploader Comments (uheardmebitch)
Top Comments
-
Addendum to my previous comment: The holes at WTC1/2 do not accomodate wing tips or vertical stabilizers. The radar returns show flight envelopes way in excess of wide-bodied planes. Total TV Fakery was disinformation, designed to divide and conquer a group of intelligent people that were waking up to a devastating truth: There Were No Planes on 9/11. IMHO, we need to hold on to this basic truth.
All Comments (20)
-
hmmm you didnt show anything here.........????? what exactly were you trying too prove???
-
No plane hit WTC but the masses are still hypnotize by the fake images
-
No scientific principles can account for aluminum airframes entirely piercing multiple HSLA steel columns and spandrel plates, plus reinforced concrete and steel floors. The Fairbanks/Hezarkhani contradiction is indisputable: the engine impact pojnts and corresponding puffballs don't align in Fairbanks. There is no legitimate physical evidence for planes, i.e. confirmed parts. NPF: No Planes: Fact!
you say he's 100% incorrect yet you offer no logical arguement to explain why...
ZORGtheALIEN 1 year ago 4
@ZORGtheALIEN the sun was north of the building. the north face was not and never was in shade. if you look at simons retarded dotted line you will see how bad his work is. it's not even close to being parallel to the building. you are a moron if you believe his tripe.
uheardmebitch 1 year ago
@uheardmebitch if you need proof of the sun claim, because you are not familiar with the events of 911, then watch the second strike. the south face is in shade. then watch the naudet first strike. the shadow of the plane is on the building and the whole face is in sun. do your homework and stop wasting peoples precious time.
uheardmebitch 1 year ago
christ it's just getting sad now. 21 seconds to bring down simons september bullshit. is that the record now? i wanna see if someone can do it in 15.
monkeygoatchicken 3 years ago
i'll see what i can do ;)
uheardmebitch 3 years ago