3D glasses: passive vs active 3D

Descubre las diferencias entre gafas de obturación activa y gafas polarizadas

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• passive
• vs
• active 3D
• glasses
• how it works
• LG
• Cinema 3D
• gafas 3d

[Josechuman]

Aún a riesgo de empezar un flame, voy a decir que esto me aprece algo pasajero, y por una razón muy obvia :

Hoy en día la evolución de la tecnologia doméstica gira en torno a ser práctica y sencilla, y llevar unas gafas para ver la televisión no es cómodo.

Más bien me parece un paso intermedio, ya que el siguiente, por lógica, será "cómo prescindir de las gafas?".

Aunque, claro está, esta "moda" está dirigida a consumidores que quieran tener lo último (no digo que sea malo)

[PepeGr4]

Qué ganas de ver como funciona en vivo, gracias por compartir el vídeo, saludos!

[steve61696]

ok is passive is better then why does Sony, Samsung and Panasonic flagship TV have active ??????

[thePussysniffer]

ITS EASY.... PASSIVE IS CHEAP SO ALOT WILL JUSTIFY IT JUST COS OF THAT SHITTY REASON.. ACTIVE IS SUPERIOR HENCE EXPENSIVE.. .. CUNT!!

[MrCmo2788]

The only reason people are favoring Passive is because of the price of the glasses....I have bother active and passive TV's and my vote is on the Sony Active....Better all around....

[XHunterUltimate]

@noentiendo79998 Pero samsung usa gafas activas y son pesadas, ademas las tienes q recargar y es una weba.

[XHunterUltimate]

@EV1LDRAG0N @EV1LDRAG0N Obviamente con películas viejas de los 70s 80s la conversión a 3D no resultara tan buena como con las películas de ahora que vienen con mejor calidad.

[EV1LDRAG0N]

@PepeGr4 yo compre un monitor LG 3D Cinema, me costo algo de 327 dolares, fue una buena inversion =D puedo ver peliculas normales de los 70 y los convierte a 3D, bueno no tanto pero el 3D se nota.

[MisbehavingMal]

@LEWIS3845 Wrong on all counts except to a small extent 3d crosstalk but it's gone with good glasses.

Refresh rate/"Hz" is irrelevant as long as it's a multiple of the framerate of the material or can sync to it (Multisync).

You aren't actually missing out on lines, just per eye you get half the total image, just like with 30p on 60i. It's still all the detail just not all in one chunk. The downsides to shutter 3D are incredible, and I can tell you are covering for buyers remorse.

[jtoptimistic]

@LEWIS3845 everything you said is wrong

[LEWIS3845]

lol this is funny..active is superior yes it's more expensive,passive is a little cheaper but that doesn't mean it's better if you want the best 3d right now go dlp active 3d. The dmd chip dlp system operates at more than 4000hz way ,way faster than any lcd,led or plasma display this creates awesome flicker free,no ghosting or cross talk 3d. I have a 3d dlp projector set up in my home cinema and the 3d is better than the theater.The problem with passive is the loss of resolution 540 lines.

[Guitarnoob99]

@MultiSupermaster the glasses or the effect ? in any case prove it. Dont just say things like that you have to give some arguments why do you think so, cuz now i dont bealive you :] ... for me LG makes the best 3d effects as things actually fly out from TV other TV like samsung give an impresion of aquarium, than when active 3D is turned on its like you could see deaper into TV but nothing comes out, therefore i say LG beats them all for now at least.