That I personally mailed said document(s) via to wit:
Canada Post Office, by registered/certified mail, tracking number(s) #
(listed below with following recipient(s) At said City documents, as described as Claim of Right etc, properly enveloped and addressed to (addressee(s) and address(es)):
# Tracking number(S) Recipient(s)
1)EE 144454232 CA:Her Majesty The Queen of Buckingham Palace
2)LT 561841612 CA: Honourable James Flaherty, Minister of Finance of Canada
3) 424000377 CA: Rob Nicholson, Honourable Minister of Justice and Attorney General for Canada
4)LT 424000156 CA: Honourable David Johnston,
Governor General of Canada
5)LT 561841586 CA: Honourable Victor ''Vic'' Toews, Minister of Public Safety for Canada
6)LT 561841572 CA: Linda Lizotte-Macpherson, Commissioner Chief Executive Officer of CRA
7)LT 561841609 CA: Keith Ashfield Honourable Minister National Revenue for Canada
8) 79 561 387 468 Stephen Harper, The Prime Minister of Canada, and his successor
All parties who have been served proper Notice of this Claim of right and fail to discuss or dispute, and then infringe, violate
or abrogate said rights, directly or through their agents, employees or proxies, agree they do so under full commercial liability and are required to obey my fee schedule which applies to the situation.
All parties who have been served proper Notice of this Claim of right and fail to discuss or dispute it fall to the legal maxim "He who is silent appears to consent.
"And will bind themselves and any roles that they may hold to ensure my rights are not infringed directly or indirectly through their agents, employees proxies, or any other artificial entity which is under their jurisdictions. I am not under their jurisdiction(s), so I cannot be bothered by anything under their jurisdiction(s). This means that all undisputed parties will fall to the written default judgment.
Anyone wishing to dispute this Claim of Right and the rights within it that are claimed, must do so by way of a sworn counterclaim published in sent to myself, and sent to the public claiming the right to govern, regulate and order their fellow man without the benefit of the consent of the governed, regulated or ordered.
Failure to do so will result in permanent estoppel by acquiescence forever barring any court or government agent from interfering with the rights herein lawfully claimed.
I claim these Rights are hereby lawfully claimed and are established as Law Ten (10) days hence upon agreement or default of the document(s), as described in item 1 above listing Recipient(s).
This Notice confirms the following parties have been now severed Notice by way of service and law of Agent and Principal dose apply, and that service upon one is equal to service upon both, and I claim that anyone who interferes with my lawful activities after having been served notice of this claim and who fails to properly dispute or make lawful counterclaim is breaking the law, cannot claim good faith color of right and that such transgressions will be dealt with in a properly convened court de jure.
Certified, Notary copy(s) to wit: Good faith Notice of Agreement/Contract/Understanding/Intent, Claim of right, Fee schedule, claim of status, Claim of love, peacefulness, happiness and helpfulness towards all. Documents, as described in item 1 above to the following parties, properly enveloped and addressed to addressee(s) and address(es)
1.) Applies To Wit:
This document and all the rights contained therein, are hereby considered to be applied to myself Victor-Thomas: Bradbury, a Moorish-freeman-on-the-land, Child of God, and secured creditor for the commercial entity VICORT THOMAS BRADBURY or any derivative spelling thereof.
Enforcement of the document(s) applies to all parties which have agreed to it. Either through direct agreement, or through their silence.
All agents, officers, roles, proxies, or other form of entity which which operates under the jurisdiction of this parties which are in agreement are also binded to the document, and it is up to the government to ensure the laws that apply to them within the system of government as well as within the document(s) above listed in item 1, and that justice is properly served in accordance with the document and my wishes.
All private persons who agree to the document binds their role that they are acting as, and all parties falling under that roles jurisdiction.
This document doesn't give them any of my rights, but it does give them the ability to defend my rights, and the obligation to not violate them.
2.) Default Judgment
All concerned parties have twenty-one (21) days to dispute or deny any of the facts mentioned herein. Failure to do so indicates full agreement and acceptance.
Loading...
6:20
Everyone Is a Slaveby Luigi842895,014 views
@JonDeth Will do. Thanks!
ytBG 6 months ago
@ytBG to digress further, it specifically said this is a notice informing you that you are to report for duty.
Basically they set a trap and you step into it believing you are obligated. Our notices on the other hand have to be more clever. it's far better to challenge their authoritative duty once you have voided all contracts and revoked consent to be governed or represented.
Look up Dean Clifford's videos on UKblive, he uses the dispute of authority I came up with some months ago.
JonDeth 6 months ago
@ytBG of course and they do it all the time. They do not even bother to serve the notice correctly, that is how corrupt they are. My niece received a jury duty notice in the mail ORDERING her to report to the courthouse by a certain date.
Ordering?
That is to claim we are obligated and taking orders as though we are in the military. Meanwhile, they could not even prove they served the notice since it came by standard mail. Nor could they claim she opened it. Know enough and that's your defense.
JonDeth 6 months ago
@JonDeth With all due respect, does your line of reasoning, which seems plausible, go both ways? If a government entity sends a registered notice to a man and he does not react to it, can he then successfully claim in court he treated it as junk mail? Doesn't the fact that the piece of mail is registered stand as a notice itself?
ytBG 6 months ago
The nonsense logic behind this is also to claim if I send you a notarized claim of forfeiture of all your property by receiving this notice and a default judgment in 14 days if you fail to respond, I could mail out hundreds of these at random now couldn't I and in many cases they would be assumed to be a scam, tossed in the garbage then 14 days later, I show up with the sheriffs to claim my shit.
Not happening!
Registered mail has no power in law, just evidence of delivery.
Menard scammed you.
JonDeth 7 months ago
These notices you are sold into are a complete scam and I can very simply explain why. It merely proves the mail was signed for and received, it does not mean the notice was reviewed and acceptance does not create adhesion in law.
So in other words, they will merely pocket vito it which is to say, yes it was received but not read and I am under no obligation to read it.
Send it via process server, the CORRECT way and guaranteed they respond to your "claim of right".
JonDeth 7 months ago