Marlo Lewis Responds to Al Gore's Appearance on Oprah

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
16,010
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 7, 2006

Marlo Lewis responds to assertions made by Al Gore on the Oprah Winfrey show.

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 19 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (51)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • DO YOU BELIEVE IN ANGELS OPRAH says THE ANGEL LOOKAGAIN

    ^

    GOOGLE > YOU ARE BUSTED OPRAH says THE ANGEL SURETY ROSE :-)

    OPRAH AND OBAMA ARE BUSTED WITH BILL CLINTON AL GORE AND GEORGE BUSH FOR FAKE NAME INTERNET and YOUTUBE SATANISM :-)

    spuddy83 has posted a comment to your profile‏ = Whats with the John Joseph O'brien, none of your stuff makes any sense

    ^

    Google > WHERE HAVE I HEARD THAT BEFORE OPRAH says John Joseph O'Brien :-)

  • who's this ass..? he just wants to be popular i gez.. man,the things they do for popularity..

  • who's this douche?

  • global warming isn't real

  • First define vitriol. I see none in my post, yet words like "ignorant" and "malicious" populate yours.

    Second, your rhetoric is is indicative of one who is defending a religious point, not a scientific point. If you had evidence you'd present it. You have emotions and belief, so that's all you put out. So no need to respond. I didn't ask for a response in the first place considering the quality of your logic (or lack thereof).

  • I'd be happy to respond to your message - if you had one. But the fact is that you are the one who attacks the messenger; just look at all of your comments - there is no information, just vitriol. It seems that you are the one who lacks objectivity. At this point in human history, climate change contrarians are either ignorant, malicious, or they have ulterior motives.

  • So your ideal of science is seeing one thing go up, then seeing another thing go up, and the correlating them via human induced causes? Wake the F*** up indeed.

  • He must since Al Gore and environmentalist aren't objective.

  • Nobody said that. Man barely influences climate, if he does at all.

  • It seems all you people can do is attack the messenger because you can't attack the message. I'm not convinced.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more