First define vitriol. I see none in my post, yet words like "ignorant" and "malicious" populate yours.
Second, your rhetoric is is indicative of one who is defending a religious point, not a scientific point. If you had evidence you'd present it. You have emotions and belief, so that's all you put out. So no need to respond. I didn't ask for a response in the first place considering the quality of your logic (or lack thereof).
I'd be happy to respond to your message - if you had one. But the fact is that you are the one who attacks the messenger; just look at all of your comments - there is no information, just vitriol. It seems that you are the one who lacks objectivity. At this point in human history, climate change contrarians are either ignorant, malicious, or they have ulterior motives.
So your ideal of science is seeing one thing go up, then seeing another thing go up, and the correlating them via human induced causes? Wake the F*** up indeed.
DO YOU BELIEVE IN ANGELS OPRAH says THE ANGEL LOOKAGAIN
^
GOOGLE > YOU ARE BUSTED OPRAH says THE ANGEL SURETY ROSE :-)
OPRAH AND OBAMA ARE BUSTED WITH BILL CLINTON AL GORE AND GEORGE BUSH FOR FAKE NAME INTERNET and YOUTUBE SATANISM :-)
spuddy83 has posted a comment to your profile = Whats with the John Joseph O'brien, none of your stuff makes any sense
^
Google > WHERE HAVE I HEARD THAT BEFORE OPRAH says John Joseph O'Brien :-)
TKTRV 1 year ago
who's this ass..? he just wants to be popular i gez.. man,the things they do for popularity..
moonlight1001 3 years ago
who's this douche?
ManBearPigIsCereal 4 years ago
global warming isn't real
CrunchToastMan 4 years ago
First define vitriol. I see none in my post, yet words like "ignorant" and "malicious" populate yours.
Second, your rhetoric is is indicative of one who is defending a religious point, not a scientific point. If you had evidence you'd present it. You have emotions and belief, so that's all you put out. So no need to respond. I didn't ask for a response in the first place considering the quality of your logic (or lack thereof).
gwholmes 4 years ago
I'd be happy to respond to your message - if you had one. But the fact is that you are the one who attacks the messenger; just look at all of your comments - there is no information, just vitriol. It seems that you are the one who lacks objectivity. At this point in human history, climate change contrarians are either ignorant, malicious, or they have ulterior motives.
luditemike 4 years ago
So your ideal of science is seeing one thing go up, then seeing another thing go up, and the correlating them via human induced causes? Wake the F*** up indeed.
gwholmes 4 years ago
He must since Al Gore and environmentalist aren't objective.
gwholmes 4 years ago
Nobody said that. Man barely influences climate, if he does at all.
gwholmes 4 years ago
It seems all you people can do is attack the messenger because you can't attack the message. I'm not convinced.
gwholmes 4 years ago