TEA party: beginning of the Second American Revolution or Massive Fraud?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
656 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 21, 2009

Are the Tea Party's a massive pysop meant to channel the patriot movement into the false left VS right political structure?

You decide.

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • There is no right or left.

  • I agree with you 100%. Watching the news, I noticed how they kept making it into a "right wing" movement. They continued to seperate us. This is how they keep all the sheep distracted. They pit us against each other. I am glad to see someone else things this way

see all

All Comments (13)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @AlienScientist Good context-replacing exercise. The media should underline this fact...

  • @AlienScientist I agree, they have been hijacked by neocons

  • Yes this is the fraudulent part of the movement.

    The REAL Tea Party started in Boston in 2006, it was protesting the fraud that was the 9/11 Commission Report. We have the second TEA PARTY in 2007 where I met Steven Jones and Kevin Ryan. Then in 2008 the Tea Party turned into a campaign to get Ron Paul elected... It's taken off from there.

    And I am proud to have watched it happen and taken part in this revolution from it's inception. Keep fighting for Truth, Peace, and Freedom!

  • Real origins of the Tea Party movement

    YouTube - watch?v=Dy5zYRv0yJo

  • Very thought provoking commentary in this vid. There nothing wrong with making sure the energy and focus necessary to restore Liberty is being spent in the right direction.

  • I don't know - why would he want to run as a republican? They are now the political Albatross. I think the "R" acted more like a Danforth anchor on his campaign. Perot managed to get to the ballots and the debate-as sad as THAT scene was, but at least Ron Paul wouldn't come off as a weezlie madman like Perot did.

  • I think he brought awareness to himself and the movement by running republican.

  • Ron Paul should have run as what he is - a Libertarian. All he did by running as a Republican was to keep himself from taking votes from the democrats and the Republicans. He may have had a better chance than Perot. Of course, Ronald MacDonald would have done better than Perot.

  • Personally I think fox hijacked the movement to make it seem like it's a right movement.

  • I AGREE 100%.

    Great analysis.

    There is no right/left...it's a false paradigm...it's all BS.

    Wake up people....911 Was "Another" Inside Job!!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more