Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Civil debating 101

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
7,972
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 5, 2006

These two make politics today seem tame.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (24)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The origins of Fox Noise...

  • fuck buckley and his pretentious pseudo intelligent drivel

  • Why can't we hear the final piece of audio?

  • One thing I admire about Buckley is that he usually was very civil. This is the only instance where I have seen him get really nasty with a debating opponent, and you have to admit that Vidal provoked him a bit. Nobody likes being called a Nazi, "crypto-" or otherwise.

  • It's funny how these left wing idiots will always say being gay is great, they need special rights, etc... and then name call conservatives falsely calling them homosexuals. They usually do this when the target of their LIE is dead and unable to defend themselves.

  • you idiot buckley is a satanist!! he does send crypted messages, listen to all his interviews, they man has no center, he is floating

  • well I can't post it here, although if you do a case sensitive search for "distasteful encounter with william" and "vidal" you should find it. I am unsure of the use of the word "defacto" in other countries, but in Australia it means an intimate relationship that has lasted more than three years while residing in the same premises. The article comments on the idea of using the word "queer" as an insult, by the way.

  • Its not really a grammatical but a conceptual point: all relationships are defacto if they are in fact relationships so its kind of redundant unless the relationship is somehow hidden. And homosexual relationships tend to be....As for that essay, running through it I find no mention of what you claim - but thats no surprise since it was written in 1969.

  • And the defacto relationship was homosexual in nature. Both are correct, so the initial criticism of my grammar was incorrect. As for substantiation, the point was answered by Vidal's "Distasteful encounter with William F Buckley"

  • Its the homosexual relationship thats defacto, not the other way around. But please substantiate regardless of what you want to call it.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more