sheikh hamza yusuf - thoughts on the science delusion (123channels.com).wmv

islam speech,islamic speech,sheikh hamza yusuf,hamza yusuf,sheikh hamza yusuf speech,sheikh hamza yusuf's speech,islam debate,islamic debate,muslim speech

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• islam speech
• islamic speech
• sheikh hamza yusuf
• hamza yusuf
• sheikh hamza yusuf speech
• sheikh hamza yusuf's speech
• islam debate
• islamic debate
• muslim speech

[TheRobClarity]

@Metsada007 Science is not atheism.

[Metsada007]

The atheist delusion.

[mirnesalic]

@wimahlers I am really wondering how you draw conclusions and where you find merits for "beastly" discrimination that Hamza Yusuf is professing. There is nothing weird or beastly in that video. Thinking in scientific terms, same-sex marriage is simply unproductive and would be exterminated by shear force of "evolution" anyway. Religion tries to make you think what is the beastly behavior, and I certainly don't see any of "it" in H.Y. lectures.

[wimahlers]

And here is Hamza Yusuf professing as a beast based on his interpretation of his religion:

watch?v=iXRnWTB2FRg

Killing homosexuals or actively discriminating homosexuals would be acting like a beast. Haza Yusuf is dangerously close from acting as a beast upon his profession.

[wimahlers]

@mirnesalic,

.

"what  is the difference between animal and the beast?"

.

Note: It is not the(!) beast but a(!) beast.

The definition for beast in this(!) context is:

"a cruel or immoral person, especially one who behaves in a violent or sexual way"

An animali in this(!) context is:

"any living thing that can move independently and that has senses for recognizing and reacting to the environment around it. Animals are divided into two groups, vertebrates and invertebrates"

[mirnesalic]

@wimahlers in your scientific opinion, what is the difference between animal and the beast?

[schmatt13]

The dichotomy you present demonstrates your lack of understanding of scientific practise. Watson's level of experitise comparable to mine is immaterial, what really matters is what he can prove. If there is substantial, peer reviewed evidence that indicates the inferiority of one race in respect to another, I shan't be found to be arguing with the facts.Science is merely the most accurate description of reality we have at any one time, it's not a political manifesto or an ideology.

[schmatt13]

@desipimp299 Science is a methodological process by which to derive explanations for natural phenomena, it's really that simple. Science is not identifiable as a person or a crackpot political idea. Incidently Yusef claims that this idea about sterilizing poor people lead to eugenics and ultimately the holocaust. Is that to say that all the poor in Europe just so happened to be Jewish? Ah.... more bullshit.

[wimahlers]

1:00 Suggestion: Why don't you take the best of religion and the worst of science? You still loose!

2:00 The "science" of eugenics never was accepted science. Don't believe me? Show me which scientific institution has ever accepted eugenics. It is none.

4:00 The 20th century only had the worst wars because of technology. If you factor that out than, indeed, religion is the main and dominant breeding ground for wars.

5:00 We are animals! But it takes religion to act as a beast.

[desipimp299]

@schmatt13 They were proven true according to the standards of science of the time. It was an objective scientific truth with empirical evidence as far as those scientists were concerned. Dr. Watson - one of the most famous scientist alive today - claimed in recent years that black people are less intelligent than white people. Now you have 1 of 2 choices - believe that Dr. Watson is wrong & you know more science than Dr. Watson or that black people really are less intelligent. Your choice?