Meyers Water Buggy-Repost

detailed pictures of the Meyers buggy and its components.

repost

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• stanley
• meyer
• water
• buggy
• HHO
• electrolysis
• hydrogen
• browns
• gaswater
• fuel
• injector
• electron
• extraction

[0ddba11s]

Has anyone got any definite accurate info one what happened to this car?

[m3sca1]

heard that his mrother had it stashed somewhere,and that it went up for sale...probably just hearsay

[cypherbane139]

well he was NOT running the dune buggy off of the recombination of the water molecule. that is stupid. he took the gas and stripped it of nessisary electrons, then when the "sub'critical" gas ions are ignited, the missing electrons prevents the formation of water. and in seeking nutrality, the atoms collapse, converting into 100% energy..... he wasnt messing around with hydrgen, he was messing around with atomic bombs =\

[m3sca1]

technically speaking -its not nuclear because the idea was to strip electrons which are outside of the nuclues.

thanx for commenting

[merlinspower]

Stan meyers lecture was very important in this regard , normally people over look this fact, Explosive amounts of hydrogen produced , with LOW amps and High voltage discharge,.. that equals LOW heat and energy consumption, result massive amounts of Hydrogen that allows you to make your own FUEL, for Heat, cooking, water heaters, and transportation. Taking you and everyone else OFF the grid, is threat to tax revenue and profits

[juggernautxtr]

@juggernautxtr

you don't have to believe me japan just released a car running on Meyers principles

only using straight hydrogen to convert water to steam in the engine cylinder

oh shit huh?.

[stovelover63]

Please get rid of the music

[kosta9499709]

if you wonna all stan patents inbx me!!!!

[shadowlacer]

yes the rest of the world will surpass us cause they are not ruled by oil

[bersaba]

Look I'll break this down.

A conventional car burns fuel (gasoline) to turn a shaft to turn a tire. Simply put, the gasoline is a the 'wood on the fire'.

A water car, even if you convert it to gas to burn (which is possible, electrolysis), converting the water takes more energy to convert the water to H and OH then you can get back out, or else it would be a form of perpetual motion.

In which case you're not 'benefiting' anything. Just use an electric car and be done with it.

[bersaba]

Something along the lines of a company manufacturing them. A person taking out multiple patents and becoming a billionaire as they solve the worlds oil problem.

All we have now is a guy that claimed it to a normal media guy a bunch of years ago. A guy that was found to be a fraud by the courts, that died of an aneurysm and that conspiracy believers have changed the story of.

I'm a skeptic. I won't simply believe this without some decent evidence.

[bersaba]

@HereIsJesus

One last attempt. If the technology is "out there" and people can do it, where is the evidence. Where are the vehicles driving around on water? Why hasn't someone that's built one contacted media? Only 2 possibilities can really exist.

1: That it doesn't exist, and that makes the rest of this conversation meaningless.

2: That the people that make it are being kept silent.

Now I'm not a conspiracy nut, that rules out 2. If someone's built it, show me the evidence (real evidence).

[bersaba]

@HereIsJesus

I wasn't being difficult. It's that when you write out chemical compounds on paper like that, the way you write it is important. That's why HOH is correct and HHO is incorrect. The "shorthand" for HOH is either H2O or just plain old water. HOH (or H-O-H) is chemically correct. Hell I learnt that back in high school.

[bersaba]

@smokyatgroups

Small quib. Water would be H-O-H not HHO. Hydrogen has 1 bond and oxygen has 2, so the oxygen has to go in the middle.

[bersaba]

@HereIsJesus

I've got no problem with people wanting to build their own buggy on modified meyer "tech". I DO have a problem with conspiracy nuts claiming bullshit as fact, trying to bypass physics, and generally being stupid. Make a car that's energy efficent and you have my applause. Say a car that works on effectively perpetual motion was built then covered up and provide not a shread of evidence and I'll call you (you being whoever) a moron.

[bersaba]

@slushomatic

I did, the question is did you (outside you're 'conspiracy are us' websites). I mean somewhere credible, or at the very least, mildly credible. For the record, the autopsy report (which is on record), by the Franklin County, Ohio coroner, states he died of... wait for it... aneurysm. Read "The Car That Ran On Water" on the columbus dispatch site for a complete breakdown of the events.