Lord of the Flies 1990 Part 13

A group of young boys are stranded alone on an island. Left to fend for themselves, they must take on the responsibilities of adults, even if they are not ready to do so. Inevitably, two factions form: one group (lead by Ralph) want to build shelters and collect food, whereas Jack's group would rather have fun and HUNT; illustrating the difference between civilization and savagery.

Important: all copyright goes to the owner!

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

• LOTF
• Lord of the Flies
• 1990
• Lord of the Flies 1990
• Ralph
• Piggy
• Jack
• Roger
• Sameric
• Simon
• Movie
• ''Balthazar
• Getty''
• ''Chris
• Furrh''
• ''Danuel
• Pipoly''
• ''James
• Badge
• Dale''
• ''Andrew
• Taft''
• ''Edward

[kruppenstein]

At first we were like: KILLKILLKILLKILLKILL

But then: Oh shit the adults are here we're screwed

[bertmustin]

The Marines should have opened fired on the little shits.

[chlemhan69]

even though the storyline was different to the book, the movie in itself was great.

[TheVenturino123]

alternative ending:

Jack: "yay we killed ralph!!"

Member: "But Jack what are we going to do about the forest being on fire now??"

Jack: ".....oh yeah....uhhh"

[awesometv25]

Said in the book*

[awesometv25]

Not too bad. The characters were portrayed pretty well. However, don't watch this instead of the book. I read the book in class and this version of the movie is really off. The boys are suppose to be British, there is no burning tree at the beginning, there is no adult whatsoever, and the monster is suppose to be a dead parachutist. If you're good to watch the movie, watch the 1963 version, yes, it's old, but more of the elements from the book are there, and the characters sometimes actually sa

[12MonkeyPurple]

Thy need to put Jack up in the nuthouse.

[PRIMExGT]

...probably cuz i didn't read the book.

DOUBLE LOL =D

[PRIMExGT]

lol, didn't see that comin...

[MrBosif95]

fyi anyone who is thinking about not reading the book and watching this instead, dont. its a huge mistake. and for all the BS interpretations that people leave in the comments, go do some research before you enlighten us with your infinite wisdom on post war british literature and william goldings intentions. once you realize that is a type of defense of british colonialism while intended to be a portrayal of the darkness of man's heart with simon as a christ-figure, come talk to me.

[MrBosif95]

the only thing good was the actors. they were pretty good except they should have had british accents but thats not their fault

[MrBosif95]

honestly i would love to meet the guy that said, "hey, i should make a movie out of one of the greatest post war british novels and change every important thing to make it better, except it will be terrible." The kids are supposed to be british, there is no captain, the monster is a dead paratrooper, sam and eric are forced to join the other tribe, and just about every other important detail is changed to diminish the character build up and destroy the symbolism of th entire story. GOOD JOB