On a website, if a page B implements a rel="canonical" link tag with URL of page A, do robots follow every links in page B? Ad, Paris
Have a question? Ask it in our Webmaster Help Forum: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters?hl=en
Want your question to be answered on a video like this? Follow us on Twitter and look for an announcement when we take new questions: http://twitter.com/googlewmc
More videos: http://www.youtube.com/GoogleWebmasterHelp
Webmaster Central Blog: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/
Webmaster Central: http://www.google.com/webmasters
Is this the reason why you now block links off from Youtube?
asas2jh 1 month ago
This is programming stuff. Quite for programmers. But anyway, it is relevant.
agapitoflores001 3 months ago
backlinkschecker.ws
Thanks for the nice info.
sachinruhela 6 months ago
haha, I love the smile in the beginning!
unitedpriority 7 months ago
geez. don't they pay their employees enough to afford something more than a t-shirt?
rainy818 7 months ago
I would love to hear an answer to the following question: "If you blast a money site directly with 20000 links using xrumer/scrapebox, will my site rank better even my link is on pages with hundreds of viagra links or will my site be penalized?" ;)
WindowsSoftwareDe 7 months ago
@IgorHW well i do understand what you are talking about. Internal PR composes of various metrics which are not obviously included while calculating toolbar PR. But one thing can't be neglected that at somepoint few ranking metrics are alike for the both and that's the reason why a trusted site is always having google toolbar PR. So, whatever we can talk about, but the fact is toolbar PR still acts as an trusted indicator for getting an impression about the site at a glance.
backlinkchecker 7 months ago
@backlinkchecker You are supposed to neglect toolbar PR, Matt is talking about Google internal PR.
IgorHW 7 months ago
If PR is still an important factor then how come SEO geeks suggest to neglect PR as SEO metrices?
backlinkchecker 7 months ago
this answer was a little bit ambiguous :)
chiefra 7 months ago