Michael Savage debates a caller on the gay marriage ban being overturned

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
10,877
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 5, 2010

No description available.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 38 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Liberal= lazy gay marxist atheist.

  • 4:00 No, religious institutions are not required to recognize gay marriages, but government may.

see all

All Comments (464)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @JDPKRevolution

    laziness, gayness, marxism, atheism, all won't be the reason why the earth will end in nuclear explosions.

  • genesis 2 18-25 Doesn't say that God crated another man to be Adam's helper or that another man would leave his parents to cleave to another man. God stipulates that we are to procreate. That's impossible for a man & another man. These are the core tenants given by God. God destroyed Sodom & Gomorrah because of Sin. Pat of the reason was because of Homosexuality. The bible is very clear on this. However, we're not to hate our neighbor. That doesn't mean we have to accept their lifestyle.

  • Michael Savage is a complete idiot.

  • Michael Savage is a complete idiot.

  • @tillallareoneluv that's the most sane thing I have heard in a while. I agree 100%. Just get the state out of the way. If the catholics don't like gay marrige, they should be allowed to say "we don't consider you two married". If a group does recognize gay marrige, let gay people get married in that group :) I like your thinking

  • This guy can't argue his way out of a paper bag.

  • @Tomacomo Lol, nice try, but NOT.

    "multicultural"= Yeah. What's wrong with that?

    "internationalist"= Perhaps, but that doesn't mean I don't feel a pretty large degree of patriotism.

    "socialist"= No. But nice try at guilt by association. "Socialist" would imply that I hate capitalism, and I don't. I love capitalism.

    "fascist"= No. "Fascist" would imply that I oppose any form of political debate or ideological diversity, freedom or civil rights, and that's not true.

    Better luck next time, idiot.

  • @tecaltabiano

    social democrat = multicultural internationalist socialist facist.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more