Jesse Ventura on 9/11 with Alex Jones 2008 -- Part 1 of 3

I still have never seen any proof.

I know. Get all hot and heavy and come back with some more crap u read on the CT site. While I have the facts and intellectuals on my side, u have the whack pack who has never proven a single shred of evidence under scientific scrutiny. Please feel free and identify any statements that I've made so far that r false. Ive considered in my mind the possibility of the Inside Job theory, have u ever considered that u might, just maybe wrong about all this? Is there even a 10% chance that u r wrong?

fool. So to counter that argument, u inside job nutbags come back with the Bentham peer reviewed paper. Unfortunately that is a pay to play organization. U pay them cash, they will publish and call ur theory on zombies "peer reviewed". Not to mention they r a chemistry organization. If there is so much legitimacy to these claims, why not submit them everywhere and let scholars approve or deny their legitimacy? Oh thats right, bc u cant get bullshit peer reviewed it just doesnt work that way.

ROFLMMFAO@mookow77. You call ME a fool, then try to refute facts with ignorant analogies? There's an old saying 'Birds of a feather flock together', and the reason that saying came into existence is because you can learn a lot about a person by the company they keep. People who tell the truth do not associate with liars. Here's a quote on lies that's highly appropriate:
"If you tell a lie loud enough long enough and often enough the people will believe it." Adolf Hitler.

well done on refuting all the things I said. Oh wait, I forgot that u cant bc theyre all true. Oops. R u sure that u dont want to take a stab at the independent peer reviewed thing?..ahh, nevermind. Silly facts. Just remember, one side has tested and reviewed facts and theories while the other has nothing but crackpot theory. And sir, I dont refute facts, I refute theories with facts. Answer the question. Why isnt there a single indepent reviewed publication supporting ur claims? Im waiting

>Just remember, one side has tested and reviewed facts and theories while the other has nothing but crackpot theory.

Agreed. Its a shame NIST aren't more professional.

Oh, so NIST is in on the plot too? You people are hilarious. How deep does this damn conspiracy go?

If you need to ask those questions, then I dont see why you would even bother to spend the time debating people who have taken the time to research these things. Thats the funny (hilarious) part.

If I brought u 10K scientists and 9,990 of them concluded one thing and 10 concluded the opposite. It would be in ur preference to believe the 10? U can spout off ur non-scientific garbage about what a conspiracy theory website told u about metal and metal fatigue but the fact is that there has not been a single peer reviewed publication that supports the controled demolition theory. Why not? Because it cant. It is based on bad science and false assumptions. Yet youll keep believing it bc ur a

Poor Minnesota