Sean Hannity was right about Donald Trump!
Uploader Comments (manicwithmark)
All Comments (54)
-
Trump proudly admits robbing Gaddafi, watch?v=Awz7YpMpO_k
-
Trump talks the truth
Fuck the US Criminal government
-
@AmericaTops who the fuck do you think supported saddam in the 80s?
-
To say that dictatorial, murderous TYRANT Saddam Hussein was the "George Washington" of Iraq has to be the MOST idiotic and ridiculous statement ever uttered! Yes, dummy, dictators can get IN by being ELECTED! Saddam Hussein is as FAR AWAY from a George Washington as East is from West! Sean Hannity is absolutely correct in this video!
-
Is Donald Trump going to Feng shui the white house?
-
@blird71 : Yes, and without some stupid moderator; just verbal "baseball bats and brass knuckles". Finally, a public figure who knows the meaning of his own name. Trump: "to win unquestionably; unable to fail." Obama has "been weighed and measured, and found wanting."
-
@TrueLight55 : God IS helping the world, and World War III's been in steady progress since 1910(I count the time it was being planned); the sinking of the Titanic(getting rid of the opponents of the Federal Reserve)was the first military act against America, followed by a rapid succession of stupid, hastily thrown-together Constitutional "Amendments".
-
@TrueLight55 : Yes, he is dangerous--to the people who have been trying to destroy America. I've been watching this "stage play" for almost 50 years, and I'm telling you that things were different, better, in fact, before that. San Francisco used to be the closest thing to a "beautiful" city imaginable; in the '60s, it was trashed.
-
@AmericaTops : Saddam Hussein was the "George Washington" of Iraq, justly elected by the Iraqi people. He made his country wealthy--our government didn't like that. Somewhere along the line, WE turned into the new version of the British Empire. Not good.
It was a mistake, but then why did democrats like Al gore push us to go after Sadam Hussein?
lfplayboy 4 years ago
How many times must this tired argument be parroted back? Is it the only one they can think of to combat scathing criticism of the worst foreign policy blunder in 40 years? Going "after" somebody is not the equivalent of invading a sovereign nation, destroying its infrastructure, fomenting a religious Civil War making the worst decisions every step of the way. It's like chopping a kids fingers off for being a brat, then saying, "Well you agreed the kid needed to be punished!" NOT. THE. SAME.
manicwithmark 4 years ago
wow how dumb
blktan22 4 years ago
Thanks, I appreciate your constructive criticism.
manicwithmark 4 years ago