Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Paul McCartney: Southbank Show 1977 (Rare) 2/3

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
5,164
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 13, 2009

Paul McCartney (later joined by Denny Laine) on the Southbank Show in Oct 1977

Part 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Vzk1DQrak0

Category:

Music

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (22)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @kcirdrab Good. I started to worry when you wrote "I suspect I know the real reason behind it, but he hasn't admitted it yet" cause i thought you meant that he didn`t want to admit that he was a double for Paul, and that that was the reason for lying about "Eleanor Rigby"

  • @Yellyist ... no, LOL

  • @kcirdrab You`re not one of these "Paul is dead" people are you??

  • @Yellyist Mmm, maybe, but he started putting out this fib about Eley Rig's name shortly after the track's release in the 60's so that doesn't fit

    I suspect I know the real reason behind it, but he hasn't admitted it yet ....

  • @kcirdrab Maybe he didn`t like the interviewer or something, or got tired of being asked the same questions about the same subject. Paul wasn`t too keen on the Beatles back in the 70`s. He didn`t play Beatles songs on stage until 1975. He didn`t like to talk about the beatles in the 70`s. He was focused on Wings, and wanted to plug Wings instead of the beatles.

  • @Yellyist Yes, I agree he knows better than any1 else what's the truth .... it's just interesting that he's been caught out fibbing on it by the Walton History Society group , & to conjecture why he's doing it

    I don't think he forgot at all, he was deliberately misleading people over it & he was caught out .... I'm just wondering why, that's all?

    This isn't a pro-John anti-Paul thing

  • @kcirdrabI This is only 10 years after he wrote "Eleanor Rigby" It might be the true story. Maybe the official story is wrong? I`m just saying that Paul knows better than anybody how "Eleanor Rigby" was written, cause he`s the composer. And on changing stories, John did that too.. That doesn`t mean that he`s lying. Maybe he forgot or something..

  • @Yellyist Yes, but he's obviously lying about it, see my above posts, I'm just not sure why he's lying on that particular issue of El Rig's name

    U make a fair point about the song credit issue tho

  • @kcirdrab Lied?? How on earth do you know that he is lying? this is the man who wrote "Eleanor Rigby" I`m sure he knows better than you the story behind that song.

  • @kcirdrab Too bad the original credit was McCartney-Lennon. I`ve got the original "please please me" album and the songs are credited McCartney-Lennon so there you go. He changed the credit back to the original, and only on songs he wrote with no help from Lennon.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more