Turn down the lights
Turn up the lights
Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Islam, Christianity and Morality ( 1 of 3 )

Islam and Christianity, do these religions, which are centuries old, address the problems of today's world? Are believers in these religions really encouraged to live moral lives once they accept...  
 
Customize

More From: MuslimByChoice

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

18 ratings
Sign in to rate
4,648 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (33)   Options

Loading...
jackfulcher (7 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
What is this? Jr. high?
kafcin (9 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Arguing like little kids!!! tut-tut-tut.... Interestingly, Islam today is where Christianity was 600 years ago,
1. Christians too back then wanted to convert the whole world to Christianity, and would kill people to prove their point. (And also, interestingly said they were spreading the message of peace).
2. Had religious dogmas(still do ofcourse), that were unfounded in scientific nature.
Peace is only a few hundred years away, and then both of you can find new people to hate.
Comment(s) marked as spam Show
apologia100 (1 year ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
answering-christianity speaks against Nadir Ahmed. This is because even Muslims can see that he is irrational and doesn't admit when he gets defreated that's why "he has never lost a debate"-Wow he needs to come back to earth
KeithTruth (1 year ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
So if I post the debate it means he won? LOL

Stupid comment. btw this debate was on Matt's website long before it was on here.
truebeliever786 (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Nadir Ahmed has a debate review of this.

He won.

Matt Slick lost.
KeithTruth (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Making a debate review of your own debate does not mean you won.

Keep telling yourself Nadir won. You are only fooling yourself.
truebeliever786 (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
That is your opinion.

I think Nadir won.

And the objective person would think that Nadir won as well.

Now I cannot speak here.

That is because it is wasting my download limit and I have very little left.
KeithTruth (1 year ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
It is always "The objective person this, this objective person that"

I have heard Sami Zaatri and Ali Altaie use the same little argument. It is funny.

Whatever. If you think Nadir won good for you.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.