Ford 545 670 Tq 4000 605 Hp 5000

Dyno testing

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• stroker
• performance
• engines

[strokerengine]

A more recent build of a 552 BBF made 705Tq and 674Hp

[strokerengine]

Tom Nelson is a great guy, has given me good advice over the years. Great engine builder for sure.

[strokerengine]

Wow you have found away to beat the laws of physics. You should ask Jon Kasse for a job.

[strokerengine]

If it ever rolls up next to you, I guess it will be kicking your ass.

[Slipknotyk06]

@origionalwinja - If the 300 I-6 gets that kind of mileage something is horribly, horribly, horribly wrong; or you're driving it at 6500 RPMs all day.

Block size does mean a lot. YOU CAN'T SQUEEZE 427 CID OUT OF A 302! A .060 bore plus stroker kit results in about 347.

The Viper motor isn't a traditional big block, it's a V10. Since it has 2 extra cylinders, which means it would be about 385 if 2 cylinders were taken off.

You lie a lot.

[vertec96]

How close are th water jackets at that bore?

[12coconutman]

@TheToxicBadger does any one have a free ford ranger that i can keep that has no engine

[TheToxicBadger]

@12coconutman Haha i like the way you think!

[jmorrison757]

Engines don't scale. Period.



[12coconutman]

now to put that in a ford ranger

[MrMango222au]

just buy a nelson racing engine

[177SCmaro]

Continued:

Let’s explore what you suggested, keeping everything proportional including rpm. A stock 300HP 5L to a stock 5500rpm 450HP 7.4L. Okay, up the rpm on the 5L engine 50% to 8250rpm. How well do you think that 5L is going to breath through 1.94 int. valves, 170cc runners and a stock cam? Do you really think it’ll make over 450HP? Compare it to a 7.4L at 5500rpm with 255cc (+50% of 170) runners with even a mild cam and just (less than 50% of 1.94) 2.19 int. valves.

[177SCmaro]

@Slipknotyk06 Gloss over? I'm using YOUR parameters. And you're changing your argument. Before you wanted the big and small engines to have the same size valves because you thought that would make them equal. Now you're changing it, saying proportionality, rather than physical equality, is included when you talked about design. If proportionality is included in design why did you suggest the big and small engine should have the same size valves in the first place?

See continued…