That might be true in many cases, but in this case the opponent was a super-careful guy who didn't even attack when he could have won. So if he attacked it was good to assume he found something to make him feel safe.
I dont really understand not going for the win. Your opponent has played like he has a blank in his hand and you even say that yourself. You play it "safe", yet almost every spell your were playing around would still of wrecked you in that last attack phase.
I'm still not 100% sure of my play there, but I'm leaning towards going for it.
idc if he's a pro player lol should have won that game a long time before his opponent played marshes, way too conservative imo
cadburycaramel 1 year ago
Definitely the right play. I wouldn't have gone for the kill either...
Philson 2 years ago
That might be true in many cases, but in this case the opponent was a super-careful guy who didn't even attack when he could have won. So if he attacked it was good to assume he found something to make him feel safe.
aaaaaaaaooooooo 2 years ago
Is it just me, or did he say Vampire Nightcock at 8:58? Thats that cards nickname at my local cardshop, might just be me.
Ellendiel 2 years ago
That's how you make the Pro Tour.
moobie02 2 years ago
I dont really understand not going for the win. Your opponent has played like he has a blank in his hand and you even say that yourself. You play it "safe", yet almost every spell your were playing around would still of wrecked you in that last attack phase.
I'm still not 100% sure of my play there, but I'm leaning towards going for it.
PokerTrikz 2 years ago
That guy was awful
Timmy12688 2 years ago
I think the other player really is "Wasted" considering he missed attacking with his "Swampwalk" creature...
heretic98 2 years ago
wow, some pretty poor play by the other guy
damanjeff7 2 years ago