Ian Xel Lungold - Mayan Calendar Comes North - 10 of 16
Uploader Comments (BlackLookingGlass)
Top Comments
-
We cannot discount Lungold's work on the basis of one factual mistake in evolution, astronomy, or biology. He was not trained in those fields. Lungold was a generalist, working in general truths. It's interesting how he and Calleman (with whom I correspond) laid the Mayan Calendar over Western Civ's science with see so many striking parallels.
If the parallels are not 100%, it doesn't discount the veracity of Lungold's interpretation of the Mayan Calendar.
Peace.
-
this guy makes ya think....great stuff
All Comments (42)
-
If nothing else, the Mayan Calendar, when applied to where it's at today (April 2011) and what we're seeing in this crazy world...if nothing else...this Mayan Calendar provides a much needed wake up call to humanity. Perhaps the greatest WAKE UP call this side of the Ice Age. Are you still sleeping? Because the alarm has been going off for a little while now. Conscious awareness of your eternal, divine aspect of being is happening for those who are "awake" to experience it. It's call the now.
-
um, for a 100k years, monkeys have having using nothing more than found rocks and sticks. Never changed. They're still here
-
He might be meaning 44000 years INTO that cycle
-
No No No! Rome doesn't fall at that time. Actually Rome expanded all over globe to this very day. We Slavic Aryans call them "WYRODOMAYE" ( Romaje) This means not from our family.
Most of today Y.T. propaganda is designed to cover up the existence of this people.
-
@centariprime Art. The consciousness of future. Now let's talk movie industry. Or let us thought think about such things that began with The Art Of The American Film. Many may say , "oh , but that's science fiction!" but what I would encourage anyone 2question is what and why the same theme such as crime & punishment? Or of the endgames themes? What of a Radical Evolution & the terminator themes? My heart has done a bit of research in questioning such things...& I've not been so far off! :)
-
@proflaura his work on the "general theory of relativity" (e=mc2) was published in 1915 though. His work on this theory started sometime in 1911-1913, but it wasnt published 'till 1915. I think that's what Ian Lunghold was referring to.
-
@BlackLookingGlass RIP Ian Xel Lungold
-cause of passing: cancer
-
Einstein's work was first published in 1905, not 1913
-
I actually looked it up , it says:
Homo erectus
Fossil range: 1.9-0.1 mya
By the way he said 100k years ago, or did i not hear correctly? And:
Neanderthal traits appeared in Europe as early as 600,000350,000 years ago
I don't think they would mess up those big dates in history so easily, rather look in the details.
-
Well the parallels SHOULD be 100% correct ,since he says they are, and the right parallels are what sets our minds for this whole interaction on the basis of the fact that what he is saying is not just belief and actuality, when the rules are set as them being non-actuality it doesn't really make sense to listen to belief-statements only, does it?
Not only that, there is evidence of art dating back 75'000 years ago. He needs to do his research a little more
centariprime 2 years ago
Well, that's kind of hard when he's dead lol..
BlackLookingGlass 2 years ago