Charles Darwin did not invent racism and slavery.

This video is in direct response to an utterly ridiculous attack upon the character of Charles Darwin by a creationist video seen on youtube.

References:
- http://www.infidels.org/library/historical/charles_darwin/descent_of_man/chap...
- http://www.rationalrevolution.net/temp/darwinday2008.htm
- http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/history/making_history/making_history_20051025.shtml
- http://www.100greatblackbritons.com/bios/john_edmonstone.html
- http://www.rationalrevolution.net/articles/darwin_nazism.htm

Category:

Education

Tags:

• darwin
• evolution
• racism
• slavery
• gary
• booker
• creation
• islamplanet
• natural
• selection

[1faithtruth]

He might have not invented it, but he sure as hell made a justification for it......soooo, it's safe to say that he was a racist and that he played a major role in the genocide that took place during his living years. SHEEPLE WAKE UP...IT'S TIME!!!

[garybooker]

@1faithtruth It is highly irritating when people make knee-jerk responses to my videos without going to verify the points from the sources. Make sure that your own eyes are open before you attempt to wake someone else from their sleep.

[oldstock1607]

@1faithtruth calling a man living in the nineteenth century a "racist" is like calling a man living in the nineteenth century an "oxygen breather." The belief that some races were superior to others was considered hard science up until (and beyond) the 1950's "Racism" wasn't even coined as a term until the early 20th century.

[amaxamon]

@TallCatsMakeGoodHats Darwin isn't to blame if others failed to read his works carefully. He comes out 100% against eugenics in Descent of Man. That ought to have settled it for any true 'Darwinian'. The problem was with the racists not CD. And humans aren't mentioned in Origin - 'races' referred to species. Actually read the book. There's not a single racist idea in it anywhere.

[garybooker]

Did you even bother to watch the video and look at the quotes? Darwin used this exact point that you just mention to REFUTE the idea of enormous differences between the races.

[garybooker]

@ crankhousedope: When you said "I must be honest, Im not a Darwin's expert," that should have been the end of it. You only made yourself look foolish when you continued to speak, and anybody that has read Darwin's works or autobiography knows that you haven't read one sentence of anything that Darwin has ever wrote. If you aren't an expert on something, then STFU and read up on it.

[1faithtruth]

@droptozro I hope you disregard this dumb downed brainwashed fool, whom made this video post, replies....clearly he has been taught my the memories of CHARLES DARWIN, which goes to say his statement/opinion are extremely one sided!! :) Stay smart my friend :)

[1faithtruth]

@droptozro You are absolutely right in everything you are saying about RACIST CHARLES DARWIN. The REAL title of his most famous book is " THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES BY MEANS OF NATURAL SELECTION, ON THE PRESERVATION OF FAVOURED RACES IN THE STRUGGLE OF LIFE." Which he stated that the WHITE race was the dominate race, and any other RACE, was inferior to the CIVILIZED WHITE MAN, more so on the lines as animals, which his dumb ass didn't know that man are the 3rd intelligent beings on the earth.

[markellion]

Ironicly Darwin did the greatest good for Christianity by driving the church out of biology. You should be thankful for that

[garybooker]

You haven't even read a 4th grade spelling book, let along books by Charles Darwin.