Carl Sagan, Stephen Hawking and Arthur C. Clarke - God, The Universe and Everything Else (1988)

Join me on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/TheScie...

Stephen Hawking, Arthur C. Clarke and Carl Sagan (via satellite) discuss the Big Bang theory, God, our existence as well as the possibility of extraterrestrial life.

• Category

  Science & Technology

[cosmingZzZz]

We need more TV shows like this one these days. Too much reality-show shit going on today...

[sephiroth7655]

Also, guys, the comments on this video should be relevant to the subject matter of the video. Religion vs. Atheism/Agnosticism is NOT a subject of the video. The subjects are black holes, the existence of God, extra terrestrial life, and generally the things of science and space or mathematics. Please don't mistake the debate of theism and atheism for the debate of religion and atheism. They are 2 completely different things. The church has nothing to do with this video so leave it out of this.

[Steve Malkony]

...is always creating life in both you and I and virtually every organism on this planet trillions of times a day. So when you say " life can only come from life" you would be inaccurate. Secondly there is no evidence to support the assertion that an eternal creator who exists outside of space and time exists never-mind that it resides outside of space time which would mean it is outside of existence or the concept that there is a place outside of space time where one could go at all.

[Steve Malkony]

...where am I going with this you may ask? Well all life is dependent upon a non-living substance for its own survival and replication I.E DNA. So technically all life from ourselves to the simplest cells comes from a non-living molecule which in order for a single living cell to replicate the non-living DNA molecules must separate as well. If the non-living DNA does not separate into two different strands then their is no cell division and thus no life. So in actuality non-life (DNA) is...

[Steve Malkony]

DNA the very thing we all have is non-living, because it is a molecule not an organism, and this molecule is not sharing organisms in any property, even in replication process as it needs co-workers ( e.g. Enzymes, RNA co-factors ) to succeed its replication. DNA is non-living because it cannot maintain homeostasis on its own. And it does not have a metabolism of its own. Is water living or non-living? Water is the simplest example of something not living but responsible for maintaining life...

[Jason Nelken]

if one says they see that there are people up in a sky, talk to a fire, or say they are a prophet of some sort, then they'd be put in a mental hospital

[Angela Pearce]

Since scientists admit that life can only come from life, then Theists and Deists have the life sciences on their side, because all life could have originated from an eternal creator of life who exists apart from this timespace matrix.

The unscientific claim of atheists is that life originated from nonliving matter, thus making a creator of life unnecessary. This claim has been debunked by millions of scientific tests. Therefore atheism is an illogical and nonscientific belief system.

[d1sturb3d0ne]

Sure... The lack of belief in an invisible man in the sky that makes men from dirt and women from a mans rib is the illogical and nonscientific belief system...

Did you ride all the way from neverland on your unicorn to make a dozen identical posts, crazy lady?!?

[Angela Pearce]

Since scientists admit that life can only come from life, then Theists and Deists have the life sciences on their side, because all life could have originated from an eternal creator of life who exists apart from this timespace matrix.

The unscientific claim of atheists is that life originated from nonliving matter, thus making a creator of life unnecessary. This claim has been debunked by millions of scientific tests. Therefore atheism is an illogical and nonscientific belief system.

[Angela Pearce]

Since scientists admit that life can only come from life, then Theists and Deists have the life sciences on their side, because all life could have originated from an eternal creator of life who exists apart from this timespace matrix.

The unscientific claim of atheists is that life originated from nonliving matter, thus making a creator of life unnecessary. This claim has been debunked by millions of scientific tests. Therefore atheism is an illogical and nonscientific belief system.

[Angela Pearce]

Since scientists admit that life can only come from life, then Theists and Deists have the life sciences on their side, because all life could have originated from an eternal creator of life who exists apart from this timespace matrix.

The unscientific claim of atheists is that life originated from nonliving matter, thus making a creator of life unnecessary. This claim has been debunked by millions of scientific tests. Therefore atheism is an illogical and nonscientific belief system.

[Angela Pearce]

Since scientists admit that life can only come from life, then Theists and Deists have the life sciences on their side, because all life could have originated from an eternal creator of life who exists apart from this timespace matrix.

The unscientific claim of atheists is that life originated from nonliving matter, thus making a creator of life unnecessary. This claim has been debunked by millions of scientific tests. Therefore atheism is an illogical and nonscientific belief system.