Debunk This! 002

NY Times Article:
http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/28/nyregion/tapes-depict-proposal-to-thwart-bo...
http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/28/nyregion/tapes-depict-proposal-to-thwart-bo...
A show presenting facts of conspiracy about events in our history. The main purpose is for debunkers to try and debunk the undebunkable.
I realize theres many more evidence I could bring in each of these episodes but will just keep it to 1 or 2 undebunkable facts which prove conspiracy and cover up.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• changedachannel
• debunk
• this
• debunkthis
• conspiracy
• theory

[ChangeDaChannel]

yack

[HKTeeVee]

What's to debunk? The FBI fucked up, it was found out and reported. Happens all the time. Pretty straightforward stuff. You don't make any conspiracy theory claims in the video aside from the one word statement "this is a conspiracy". Yes, it was. A conspiracy of terrorists to blow up the towers, a conspiracy of the FBI to infiltrate and thwart terrorists which failed, a conspiracy of the FBI to cover up that failure perhaps... ummm what is there to debunk?

[ChangeDaChannel]

@HKTeeVee That there was a conspiracy to conceal information? That the official story was BS? Gotta work on your comprehension skills.

[monkeygoodcipherbad1]

Looking at these posts is funny ... the way to get more power to your organization is to behave like that organization is incompetent, this way people throw power and money at your organization to fix the incompetency ... it even gives you a chance to publicly fire and shame less conformant members of an organization.

[ChangeDaChannel]

@monkeygoodcipherbad1 the real moronic posts come from people who act as though they know something about what is presented, when in reality they should just remain silent and be thought a fool rather than to open their mouth and remove all doubt.

[ChangeDaChannel]

@silverface125 thats their story...not mine

[wigglesza]

great...more crazy on the internet...

[Bidmartinlo]

Sometimes creepy if you go into the depths of some conspiracies. It's usually a message to the victim/s. If it's the government, then the message might be: "Fear and obey!" Because it's not like they're original or anything. x)

[rog944]

@rog944 Okay... I looked at the description.. it NYT article. I'll need to do some more research. But, damn! The mainstream media is even coming out and saying that an "FBI supervisor" was involved. Holy f@*k!

[rog944]

LoL... way to bring it dude!! So the FBI supervisor ordered the informant NOT to thwart the plot to bomb the WTC. In other words, that FBI supervisor KNEW about the bomb plot and ALLOWED it to happen (according to your source). WOW! I guess I would need to know the source of this story before I try to debunk it.

[outofslumber]

Not one video reply from 60,000 viewers trying to make the case for no FBI involvement. Thats because there is no case. They "WERE" involved!

[stocktradinginvestor]

Take the alleged "passports" found on a domestic flights identifying tge terrorists. Thats the press at work giving conspiracy theorists somethibg to go off of

[stocktradinginvestor]

This one doesnt have enough evidence either way.. all news comes from associated press, if theres a conspiracy it is just as likely one making the US look bad... Something the news media have a history of doing.

[hydroxygenman]

There is an audio clip in Zeitgeist from FBI agent Gunderson, stating what happened as you depict, it would be a good addition to this clip.

[paindrain]

the tipical condition.. perfect dictation

[ChangeDaChannel]

@vmadman 'likely' or probably doesnt cut it. And yes withholding that information was illegal, how could it not be. How could giving them real explosives not be? Screwed up? Anyhow, its pretty clear in the video and its pretty clear that excuses and not evidence is your forte.