Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Gregory Boyd on "The Myth of a Christian Nation" Part 1/3

Charlie Rose interviews Pastor Gregory Boyd on his book, "The Myth of a Christian Nation: How the Quest for Political Power Is Destroying the Church." Although Boyd is no liberal, he lost one-fift...  
 
Customize

More From: mayartay

Loading...

QuickList(0)

This is a video response to Theocracy Watch: Dominion Theology (1/5)
152 ratings
Sign in to rate
37,108 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (149)   Options

Loading...
MajorCroom (1 month ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
after starting looking at some issues in religion, and debating my belief in Christianity I would say I am atheist and while communism and atheism do have some historical connections, culture can be far more restricting than a government policy in many cases. I've decided no matter what your beliefs there are problems with your logic and you will find some way to justify evil acts if you want to commit them. No matter who you are I think you can agree power does corrupt a person.
mayartay (1 month ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
I think you have to admit atheism is pretty convenient if you seek to be free from a sense of moral obligation. There are certainly wolves among true Christians though.

Christians are subject to the same temptations (i.e., pride, deception/faulty reasoning, presumption, etc) as everyone else, but we have a God who is the Source of all truth and righteousness, and who is able to instruct those who depend on him. Absolute truth exists independently of human failure.
manonthemount (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
Atheism doesn't free you from moral obligation. It emphasizes the fact that we have moral obligations that are higher than what bronze-age folk tales or cultist priests dictate to us. Atheists identify absolute truth and morality's independence from god and the importance of adhering to virtue for its own value, not under threat of divine retribution

Religion is a convenient source of morality for those who cannot and will not see or do what is right without the penalty of eternal damnation
mayartay (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Isn't it strange that the average "man on the street" tends to adopt a "do what thou wilt" attitude when assured there is no god and no absolute moral standards? Your "sermon" is virtually ineffective in the real world. Ultimately, all that moral atheists can do is rely on police power. Might makes right. Survival of the fittest. Hmm, where have I heard that before?
mayartay (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
manonmount, your rhetoric, like everything else I see from atheists, is filled with accusations against Christians. For one thing, most Christians do not follow Christ merely to avoid eternal damnation. Sure, that works from maybe age 7 to age 18 at the latest, but then a decision must be made as to whether it really makes sense and whether God is real. Atheists, unable to comprehend the decision to follow Christ, just say we are scared of Hell.
mayartay (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Also, "bronze age cultists"?? And "atheists... adhere to virtue for its own value"?? Haha!
Get real, dude!! Atheists are no more moral than anyone else, and I've heard of some studies which show they tend to be less moral. A large number of them have psychological issues related to their fathers, if they even had one.
mayartay (1 month ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Thanks for your comment on my profile. I believe stereotyping and failure to communicate are probably the biggest problems in the world today. It is a form of dehumanizing others and, on a national level, leads to war.

I want to add one thing regarding property rights since that is a problem I see with socialism. Jesus recognized them in his parables (landowners, lords, etc) and Peter emphasized A&S's property rights while condemning their actions. It was voluntary sharing of property.
mayartay (1 month ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Jesus believed in paying taxes (involuntary surrender of property), but he made a sharp delineation between Roman (worldly) authority and divine authority. While this leaves questions about what the government has a right to take, the emphasis in Scripture seems to be on private property and charitable giving by individuals vs. state control.

Many things could be corrected in the U.S. to get our mostly capitalistic system back on course. It's a shame what the Fed & Wall St. bankers have done.
kommissarw (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Hey np M, I put it on your profile because I was being fastidious about not going off topic.

You obviously dont mind the discussion of economics under this thread.

As an Atheist I necessarily have a critically different exegesis than that of a Christian.

(Here I stumbled over the conclusions of, and relating to, belief in God being the ultimate author) I really should just worry about my theory of Exegesis of the Bible.
mayartay (1 month ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Forms of government and how to establish a just one is way beyond my expertise. However, getting the monetary system straight is of key importance.

A & S were certainly greedy. It's difficult to prove they were power hungry, but they did want respect that they hadn't earned. Simon the Magician also loved to be the center of attention.

Jesus said that whatever we do to the least of these, we also do to him. So, in a sense, they did lie to God.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.