DoNotGod rides a pink unicorn chasing pink balloons

Harpooning the fate blight fail
http://vimeo.com/groups/antinatalism/videos/29242915

I bet if you watch and listen to gloomboomdoom (DoNotGod) you will discover that he will stoop even lower than this. Some dumb muthrfuckrs defend this behavior.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• DoNotGod
• GloomBoomDoom
• Inmendham

[TomValedro]

It makes me sad to see this boring drama. In my opinion both sides should just forget this quarrel and start from a clean slate making concise and polite arguments to the opposing side.

[Barklord]

@TomValedro Initially I was open to antinatalism until I realized that many of them want to eradicate all life whether we want to or not.

[SBRslacker00]

DNG has a girlfriend? I didn't realize he was having regular sex. WTG DNG!

We definitely need to examine DNG's sex life more closely, this is serious.

[Barklord]

@SBRslacker00 Of course there is only a very small risk that Gary would have sex with a fertile female but there may also be a small minority of antinatalist men who may be considered desirable sexual partners. The impostant thing to remember about antinatalism is its zero tolerance for birth. It seems logical to promote vasectomies since it is the most reliable method other than that of abstinence. Most antinatalists may choose abstinence because sex is pointless balloon chasing activity.

[pyrrho314]

@trick0171 : the accusation that some action is implied as required by your philosophy is a fundamental part of discourse. Since it obviously is implied by antinatalism, it is not only fair play but also on point to some degree, which you should acknowledge even if ultimately you have a better rebuttal (which is unlikely in such a clear case as this, and you should realize, "yes, that does have to be out position").

The accusations Gary made are merely vile. You should see that, imo.

[electrovox1212]

IMHO,DoNotGod is too quick to "ride", and adopt the fascist/totalitarianism Bus of Anti-Natalism...: P

[WarblesOnALot]

@Barklord G'day... Well, the "Violent Dog Porn" is pretty funny. Like most unsubstantiated Ad-Hominem Attacks on- the- run, whìle exìbiting Flow Of Ideas & Pressure-Of-Speech ; old Munchekin finds hìmself Pojecting, Furiously, as he sputters. Desperately trying to think of something WORSE to say.... He's a sick Puppy indeed, sort of a fulminating Neurotic Personality-Disorder Potpourri on legs. Histrionic, Schìzoid, Paranoid & Narcissistic !

[Koluhseeuhm]

"violent dog porn" come on that is gold. Yet your eyes glaze over. What are you on? Reason??

[trick0171]

@trick0171

"The accusations Gary made are merely vile. You should see that, imo."

I did not see them as accusations in this instance. They were a response to Gratex's accusations and merely laid out to make a point against his accusations. He does not really think Gratex watched doggie porn and neither do most people watching him say that.

(END 2)

[trick0171]

@pyrrho314

Show me one antinatalist that has had a child while they held to the philosophy of antinatalism. Just one. If you cannot, then the idea that antinatalists should be "required" to have intrusive and expensive surgery to sterilize themself to be consistent with their philosophy is absurd argumentation that is just being used to malign the argument made by them.

So please point out the antinatalist that has has the child while suppoting antinataism. Only one needed.

(MORE 1)

[trick0171]

Saying "you watch dog porn" is Gary's way of calling out Gratex on the insult he had just made a moment earlier.

It is easy to tell for most people...except for Barklord who seems to take every sentence as literal.

(END 2)

[trick0171]

@pyrrho314

It is very easy to tell when lying is meant to show the absurdity of the other person insulting/lying. Saying "someone is into dog porn" is an obvious lie and meant to be as such. Especially if they say "I can make claims like that about you too". Saying "a group of people do not care about suffering" who's goal is to prevent it...is not only insulting, but if it is not a lie, is even more insulting.

(MORE 1)

[trick0171]

@pyrrho314

If the case was made for "antinatalists being with a person who wants a child", that would be a more logically consistent scenario for the antinatalist to get a vasectomy if possible - for that specific antinatalist. That was not the case made. It was pointed at ALL antinatalists, and I can guarantee my sperm will never produce a child. There is more of a change of someone stealing a stem cell from my skin, creating sperm from the stem cell, and a child producing that way.

[trick0171]

I hardly ever get involved when one person is singled out by another.

(END 2)