03 Debunking length contraction

http://www.lulu.com/content/7436620

http://www.amazon.com/Why-God-Doesnt-Exist-ebook/dp/B002IPHCME

http://www.youstupidrelativist.com/WGDE.html

http://www.youstupidrelativist.com/05SR/01Length/00SumLength.html


http://www.youstupidrelativist.com/01Math/03Dist/00SumDist.html

Special Relativity holds that distance contracts in the direction of motion of a muon traveling almost at the speed of light. Here we debunk this ridiculous claim. We show that the establishment confuses LENGTH with DISTANCE and both concepts with distance traveled. Relativists use the dynamic distance-traveled by ONE object to make an absurd claim about the static distance between TWO objects. Einstein's length contraction theory has no place in Science.

http://www.youstupidrelativist.com

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Einstein
• Hawking
• Newton
• God doesn't exist
• God exists
• Relativity
• Quantum
• Bill Gaede
• Brian Greene
• elegant universe
• Sagan
• rope hypothesis
• thread theory
• muon
• Standard Model
• LIGO
• LHC
• SLAC
• Gravity Probe B
• NASA
• distance
• length
• contraction
• Geometry
• bgaede

[Ricktards]

horrible. absolutely horrible.

[bgaede]

"absolutely horrible"

.

Yes! The religion of Mathematical Physics is beyond any rational person's comprehension! It's absolutely stunning idiocy! But you got to get used to it, Rick.

[bgaede]

10. b. How do you warp a concept, area? Do you grab this spacetime stuff with tweezers? Did you take a picture of spacetime before you warped this hammock? Is this your spacetime, area?

.

en.wikipedia org/wiki/File:Spacetime_curvat­ure.png

.

Is that fishnet what you call spacetime at your monastery? Is that what you pray to?

[bgaede]

9. "NASA's Gravity B Probe satellite proved conclusively... that large, spinning bodies (like the Earth) warp and twist space-time"

.

a. In Science, we don't prove. So you must be talking about some religion you belong to. Proof means that the priest rammed his dick up your ass. Proof means that YOU gawked! proof is in the eye of the beholder. In Science, we don't prove (subjective). In Science, we explain (objective).

[bgaede]

8. "GPS satellites work because relativity is used to correct for the motion of the satellite relative to the Earth"

.

We've been rewinding clocks for centuries, area. You've discovered nothing new.

.

youstupidrelativist com/01Math/04Grav/03AAAD html (Ref # 5 in Sec 3.0)

[bgaede]

7. "light from these stars bent about 1.75 degrees"

.

Bent???

.

Bent or DEFLECTED? Do you even understand the diff?

.

A banana is BENT or WARPED. A ping pong ball is DEFLECTED. Is the photon particle of the religion of Relativity BENT or DEFLECTED? Does 'a' wave of the religion of Math Phyz STRETCH from Andromeda to Earth or TRAVEL from Andromeda to Earth? Where does 'it' start? Where does 'it' end?

[bgaede]

6. "Einstein's General Relativity predicts that light (massless) will be affected by gravity."

.

Yes. GR also holds that fields and grav waves (i.e., LIGO) are responsible for gravity. GR has gone out of its way to cover all the bases and make the religion of Math Phyz unfalsifiable. That explains in great measure its success.

.

youstupidrelativist com/03GR/02Gravity/02FWW html

[bgaede]

5. "gravitational forces only exist between objects"

.

Correct! So what is this BS about a concept (i.e., black hole) having to do with gravity?

[bgaede]

4. Of course, if you would have taken a beginner's course in Physics, you would know the diff b/w an object and a concept. We learn the definition of the word 'object' on our first day of Physics class. Physics deals only with objects. We don't move concepts in Physics!

[bgaede]

3. "The existence of black holes does not depend on a singularity"

.

Irrelevant! An introductory course in Physics would have educated you a bit so that you don't make such gross errors. Is a black hole an object or a concept? That's the only Q you need to answer.