Creation As Science P5

Astrophysicist Dr Hugh Ross

http://www.reasons.org/

I am deeply committed to the authority of the Scriptures and their inspiration by God. I do not condemn those who prefer a young-earth interpretation of Genesis, and I expect the same. We are all searching for understanding. We must have room for the interplay of different views.


I support the ministry of Astrophysicist Dr Hugh Ross, Reasons to Believe. The very best modern science is in agreement with the Bible. Atheism is irrational in light of the evidence against it.

He presents a testable scientific model for divine creation by the God of the bible and makes predictions based on that model. He also shows why the evidence dismisses abiogenesis & panspermia entirely and supports the biblical creation account. Even down to the DNA bottleneck at Noah and family.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Creationism
• Evolution
• Hugh Ross
• Reasons to Believe
• Atheism
• Abiogenesis
• Panspermia
• Science
• God
• Cosmology
• Astronomy
• Darwinism
• Biology
• Jesus

[bigwhammyRocks]

Hence abiogenesis is rendered untenable by the scientific evidence.

[simcult]

This guy is very confused. He clearly overstates the accuracy of dating methods. 3.8 billion years is an educated estimate within an accepted standard deviation. To then take *one* estimate (the age of the earth) with an error margin and subtract it from *another estimate* (the estimated age of life) with an error margin and claim an answer to be as accurate as ZERO is unscientific and simply wishful thinking.

[porche12312]

William Bonner huh? That is SUCH a made up name. Bill BONER. Yea, pffft ...right

[MavericKLongRange]

nice info