LBJ coments on JFK assasination 1969.wmv
Top Comments
All Comments (388)
-
America is so deeply dysfunctionally flawed that it is past the time to even fritter with her sins and skeletons. The trash heap of history will settle, and afterward, a glorious new earth without people will flourish as never before possible. Human beings are a cancer. Human progress is guilt. All humanity must be eliminated. Technology will soon deliver the final breath. Breathe deep, the gathering gloom.
-
One of best pieces of antedotal evidence of LBJ's foreknowledge & complicity in the assassination is right after his swearing in on Air Force One, when he turns and winks to a smiling TX congressman Albert Thomas. First time I saw the photo -- I thought WTF..how could anyone wink and smile at a tragic time like that!
-
No matter what any commission says, there was someone behind the knoll who fired the fatal shot that blasted the rear right side of the skull off JFK's head & it was no amateur either. This was a trained marksman who knew exactly what he was doing. Was LBJ involved? Would he take the risk of getting hit by a bullet that may have missed? We know he took over once JFK was gone but I'm skeptical about LBJ being involved. He would have been fried immediately. No one is that powerful.
-
@Humes53 Read what LBJ's mistress Madeleine Brown has to say about a meeting at the home of Cowboy owner Clint Murchison the night before the assassination. I'd believe her before I believed Lyin Lyndon.
-
@714AD Lee Bowers who worked in the railroad tower saw two men a good half hour or more standing behind the stockade fence. The plotters had to have a gunman up close, the knoll, so as to make surte that JFK did not survive the shooting. Because then JFK would have had a REAL investigation and the culprits would have been caught and hung. LBJ, who was probably in on it, along with Hoover, supressed all evidence to make sure the lone nut assassin was the official report.
-
The JFK-Administration had a lot of excellent members, like Theodore Sorensen, Bobby Kennedy, Bob McNamara and Cyrus Vance.
Unfortunately, there were a number of extremely poor people - advisers, military officers and other executives - who darkened the future of beauty and hope. These include Curtis Le May, Lyndon B Johnson and Allen Dulles (Gris Bay's most prominent supporters). I need hardly add that JFK should have kicked the JE Hoover on his first day as president, this scum!
-
How much did Director J Edgar Hoover knew about the events of November 22, 1963? I don´t mean that the Bureau "did it" but what I say is did Hoover make any cover-ups regarding the investigation about the assassination?
I believe JFK was shot (the fatal third shot) from right in front of him (someone at the Grassy Knoll, or behind towards Stemmons Hway). I don´t think a man like Oswald did it...alone. He - Oswald - was part of a conspiracy (and might not have known it at all)
-
He was about to name a few others when he caught himself and just said, "others who could have been involved."
-
@Humes53 You're right about the Knoll though. A blind man could see something else was lurking out there and the fatal shot was clearly fired from the knoll. With all the confusion whoever it was quietly slipped away and remember, there was nothing like today's video cameras to monitor the activity in the streets etc. because if there had been at the time we would have known for sure exactly what happened & could have gone further than speculation. .
-
@Humes53 That's a real nasty accusation made about LBJ there.. I really doubt he had anything to do with any cover up.
@TheLensSolution Another reason the Warren Commission hasn't stood the test of time is the wholly implausible motive they attributed to Oswald. To wit: "He sought for himself a place in history- a role as the 'Great Man' who would be recognized as having been in advance of his times."
So..Oswald supposedly killed the leader of the Free World to achieve his 'place in history', yet he DENIED responsibility for the act that would have put him in that place?
Totally incongruous w/common sense.
rdstern1 2 months ago 20
@rdstern1 True. The triers of fact have to be unbiased and not prejudiced towards the victim or any aspect of the case- this is a basic principle of law. It is why judges have to recuse themselves in some cases, and why jury selection must be fair. You don't put people on it that hated the victim or were fired by him (eg. Allen Dulles) or allow it to be controlled by other people who didn't like the victim (eg. Hoover & LBJ).
TheLensSolution 2 months ago 8