Crazy Creationists 2of6

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
5,556
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 29, 2010

Creationists continue to attempt to get their particular version of theology into science classrooms. The tactics become more underhanded and grounded in legalities at individual state and schoolboard level. Eugenie Scott from the National Center for Science Education "NCSE" takes us on a journey exposing these dishonest practices whose only goal is to promote their own pseudo-science.

Please support the NCSE in their efforts.

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (djarm67)

  • Imagine a non finished lung lying there trying to create itself and having to collaborate with trees; explaining to them that they need create themselves in such a way as to produce oxygen for the lung, in exchange for carbon dioxide. Imagine a blood vessel lying in the forest crying out to anything that would listen to please create itself as blood, so that the blood vessel would finally have a reason for being and so that the blood would also.

  • @Mr88playmaker I'm calling "Poe". You cannot be this stupid.

  • @djarm67

    Be honest with yourself. Unless you can prove that what I said is "stupid" you've still got egg on your face.

  • @Mr88playmaker I'm still calling "Poe". This comment suggesting that the first is not stupid is even stupider. lol

see all

All Comments (157)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Mr88playmaker You're not making no sense. Matter in the form of habitat and resources certainly does affect the outcome of survival, which decides the survival of the genome. But put in the context of your politicization of science, comments about the '60s, Communism, and religion, and I will consider the source.

  • @djarm67 apparently he is that stupid.

  • @licensedtolive

    Matter does not add new information to the genome. DNA killed Darwin.

  • @Mr88playmaker Evolution doesn't take place in a vacuum, without interdependency on its environment. Your proposition is a non sequitur, a straw man. It has no relevancy outside of a comic strip.

  • @Mr88playmaker

    Imagine a mudskipper.

  • @Mr88playmaker lungs didn't evolve that way and you know it.

  • @Mr88playmaker Imagine a troll posting an intelligent and coherent statement.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more