Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

CV90 Mobility

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
144,521
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 23, 2006

CV90 Mobility. A Bradley get stuck in the snow during tests in Norway while the CV90 with ease goes up the mountain.

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • US Army may be much more advanced then the armies of Europe but in Europe we use things that works not the ones that are expensive

  • Gotta love the Bofors 40mm.

see all

All Comments (283)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Now THAT is a nice piece of kit. V impressive x country ability.

  • @TheNeefen Lol europe has more advanced weapons then USA. .

  • it is overlight armors. will be destroyed by any antimaterial rifles ^)))

  • @MercenarySlick busting some ancient Iraqi t-55 and downgraded export-model t-72s is hardly "real" combat experience and there is no reason to presume that Leo2, Challenger 2 or T 90 could not have performed the same tasks. I also really doubt your figure of "17.000 iraqi armored vehicles", sounds like hype.

  • @Peabush You actually have a point there :D

    It's proven in many common training camps between Nordic countries and USA. If Nordic countries (I'd say any of them) would have same amount of guns, soldiers and shit, it would win easily. ie. 3 finnish pilots using Hawk training jet won 5 USAF pilots who used F-15 in dogfight training. In arctic warfare training norwegian infantry pwnd U.S. soldiers. Sweden has awesome weapon technology. Only problem is amount of men :D

  • @ferdinand7004 What are you talking about.. Sweeden could take on the US anytime. If you take away air superiority. The machines, artillery terrain and professional independent soldiers would handle the rest. ;)

    Im just kidding...

  • @sierra190MK Did I slate the people actually doing the fighting? You think of combat; I think of war as the violent extension of politics.

  • @Kojak0

    "Wars are not won on the battlefield, but in the conference rooms."

    Yeah... right! Go tell that to anyone actually fought in a real war.

  • @Kojak0 The US left because the US public didn't support the war anymore. And do you not know what a treaty is? The North Vietnamese signed a UN-brokered peace treaty where they stated they honored the sovereignty of South Vietnam and wouldn't show any further hostilities. The US left with a victory, but didn't enter a new war when the Communists invaded the South after the US was already gone.

    There were only 20 US military personnel in Saigon when it fell.. they were all embassy staff.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more