Viktor Grebbenikov Update 2011 - Possible Validation (Visit the Links in the VIDEO DESCRIPTION)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
400 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 30, 2011

Original Website: http://www.ermetica.net/pk/?p=174

My World by Viktor Grebbenikov (Chapter 5 - Flight)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/31392711/My-World-by-Victor-Grebbenikov

Jerry Decker's Lecture with Jason Verbelli's Slideshow:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXH5VoKg5Cc

Original Presentation by Jerry Decker:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cZEWab8cxo&feature=related

Programmable Magnets:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocr_d_OTbpY

Non-Linear Magnetics:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pq_iPPfxg0w

Breakthrough Discovery in the Physics of Magnetism
http://www.correlatedmagnetics.com/news.html

Ed Leedskalnin's book "Magnetic Current"
http://www.scribd.com/doc/45650735/Magnetic-Current-Ed-Leedskalnin-Coral-Castle

Ed Leedskalnin and Coral Castle:
http://www.Leedskalnin.com
http://www.CoralCastleCode.com

Free Energy Flyer for the Public - With Working Links:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56042386/Free-Energy-Flyer-for-the-Public-With-Work...
.
.
30 Books on Suppressed Sciences:
http://www.scribd.com/my_document_collections/3113156

Science Lectures:
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLD2621711FBF297E8&feature=viewall
.
.
Lenz Law Experiments 1:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JN-A3RryOC8

Experiments 2:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ez5Vt5907wI

Experiments 3:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YjB562_ZxZ4

Joe's Magnet Strangeness:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLXrsScMm1Q
.
.
Dewey B Larson:
http://www.reciprocalsystem.com/dbl

Electric Universe Model (EUM)
http://haltonarp.com/articles
http://www.holoscience.com/
http://www.thunderbolts.info/home.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kristian_Birkeland
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giordano_Bruno
http://plasmauniverse.info/people/alfven.html
.
.
http://loshumatrix.webs.com
.
.
Vortex Basics:
http://www.feandft.com/vortex_basics.htm
.
Pier Luigi Ighina:
http://www.rexresearch.com/ighina/ighina.htm

Ighina Info Page:
http://fortunadrago.xoom.it/main/?page_id=185&lang=en
.
Walter Russell
http://www.feandft.com
.
John Keely
http://www.svpvril.com
.
Open Source Info
http://www.RexResearch.com
http://www.OverUnity.com
http://www.trufax.org
.
Dan Winter's Imploder:
http://www.FractalField.com/implodernews

ElectroCulturing:
http://www.rexresearch.com/elculture/elculture.htm
http://www.rexresearch.com/agro2/0agro1.htm
http://www.electrocultureandmagnetoculture.com/links.html
.
Clayton Nolte
http://www.NaturalActionWater.com
.
Andrea Rossi
http://www.peswiki.com/index.php/Mainstream_News:Andrea_Rossi%27s_LENR_E-Cat
.
Marcel Vogel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YE4zMYJwAMA
.
Dr. Keshava Bhat
http://www.feandft.com/Dr.%20Bhat.htm
.
Stan Meyers
http://www.Waterpoweredcar.com
http://www.AlexPetty.com
http://www.RWGresearch.com
.
Dr. Patrick Flanagan
http://www.rexresearch.com/flanagan/neuroph.htm
.
Willhelm Reich
http://www.orgone.org
.
Alternative Cancer Treatments
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbAjfm0J134
http://www.royal-rife.com
http://PhoenixTears.ca
http://www.VitaminB17.net
http://thedcasite.com
http://www.sutherlandiaopc.com
.
.
You get what you pay for.
And you pay for what you want.

The people of the world pay for gas, oil, radiation, and the carcinogens that come with it. For war, for company bailouts, etc.

We must Really want all that stuff!
Money spent on war, gas, oil, nukes, bailouts .... $1,864,592,488,503,009,778,021,599 (and rising)

Money spent on New Energy Technologies ... $0

Follow the money as they say.
If they are too big to fail, then we must be too small to succeed.

Rather than dropping another 25 million dollar missile on some poor person's home in Afghanistan... why not hold off on 1 missile, give that money to people like John Searl, John Bedini, Marko Rodin, Andrea Rossi or SOMEONE who will try something new rather than spending BILLIONS of dollars to repeat our actions expecting different results.

We all know Einstein's famous quote regarding Insanity.

All I'm saying is... if the Pentagon spent $84 million dollars today... why can't we get 1?

All I'm saying is... if BP oil can make 5.6 BILLION dollar PROFIT after spilling oil in the Gulf of Mexico.... Why can't we get 1 million?

All I'm saying is... if the Federal Government can print fiat currency notes out of thin air to bail out banks and car companies for BILLIONS of dollars... why can't they just print some more out so WE can have some too?

If free energy technologies were given equal funding to NASA or CERN, we would feed the world rather than bomb the world.

You get what you pay for.
So... what are YOUR tax dollars doing these days?

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (TheRealVerbz2)

  • This would be more convincing to me if a non-metal tool was used to pick up the objects.

  • @denplaza I think it's even more convincing because the metal of the tweezers is somehow interacting with the bug shells and creates what's called an Eddy Current.

    WE need to do some more experiments to validate this!

    All I know is that I encountered the Same phenomenon while playing with a bees body.

    I filmed it and took pictures too.

    See the first few links in the video description.

    Really Really weird stuff!

    Also look into how sacred Beetles and Bees were in Ancient Egypt.

  • the videos are crearly fake.. there is some kind of small motor in the firs part (why didnt he used a niddle for example..?) and non visable wire in the second video i dont think it's real

    in video 5 you can clearly see there are 2 wires connected from each side of the of the piece and someone is picking it up in the air ,the movement is not natural look again..

  • @vinshbrief Well to me they're real because I've seen a similar phenomenon while playing with bees bodies.

    The movement IS natural if you've seen reactions from eddy currents, magnets, static electricity, etc.

    I don't see any wires at all.

    And there is no motor attached in the first video.

    He has 1 half of the shell attached to a razor blade handle and simply touches it to the other half of the shell.

    At the end of the first video you can see the shell drop from the handle. No motor.

  • @TheRealVerbz2

    please look again carfully in video 5 - this is not natural movement of the shell look how it raises up, with like 2 magic trick wires that attached to both side of the shell, and after it's in the air it moves from side to side..that exactly what would happen if 2 string are connected to it from both sides. video 5 shows it's fake

  • @vinshbrief That IS a natural action!

    That's the very phenomenon Viktor Grebbenikov called the Cavernous Structure Effect.

    Energy is bumping randomly around us.

    When the atoms of a material are aligned a certain way, they act as a diode for that random energy and put it in uniform motion.

    The atoms making up the bug shell are arranged in a Very unique way which directs magnetic energy.

    When atoms are aligned in a cone or concave surface... weird things happen.

    See video description.

  • @vinshbrief Let me ask you this... IF you were to see that in person and saw there were definitely no strings... how would you explain it?

see all

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Its time to use that hacker´s Knowledge, This is not a copyrighted material, IT MUST be published over world!

  • @curtsher11 And the phenomenon is so inconsistent, that it can run away from your tweezers... you get excited and then it just doesn't do it again.

    So you consider it a fluke and dismiss it.

    Especially if you aren't aware of "paranormal" abilities, or different electrical / "psychic" phenomenon, then you'd never even think to run experiments like this.

    Scientists aim towards an end result while experimenting.

    If they don't believe in the end result, they won't even bother.

  • @curtsher11 People who use the Scientific Method might Never discover it because all these things were discovered by accident and going against normal procedure.

    People are so stuck in specific routines they don't notice the subtle things.

    It almost slipped my mind when I went to grab the bee's body and it ran away from the tweezers. Easy to dismiss as "the wind blew it."

    Now that I look back, I realize I've encountered this MANY times growing up, but didn't realize it.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more