Obama: Would Overhaul Bush Faith-based Program

PlusObama: Would Overhaul Bush Faith-based ProgramObama: Would Overhaul Bush Faith-based ProgramThe Associated PressDemocrat Barack Obama is announcing plans to expand President Bush's program steering federal social service dollars to religious groups. (July 1)This video contains ONLY natural sound. No script is available.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• obama
• obama:
• overhaul
• bush
• faith-based
• program

[Barnmol]

LOL you cant just take the other sides slogans and use it for your own!

Imagine if Obama started campaigning with "Country First" as his new slogan the way McCain took Obama's "Change We Can Believe In" and started using the word "change" as his platform!

Are the republicans too lazy to come up with their own ideas that they have to steal them from the democrats?

Barack is NOT 4 more years of Bush. Palin would be EXACTLY 4 more years of Bush... only worse. MUCH worse.

[RobertGary1]

Obama is amazing. I've never seen anyone able to play both sides of the field. He'll say anything he needs to. Vote for John Galt.

[fawkUtube]

@Barnmol you put your foot in your mouth yet? not that it matters which puppet you vote for

[IronJackalTw]

Obama = Bush 2.0! Of course, he like those SOCIALIST programs started by Bush 1.0! There is nothing SECULAR on those FAITH-BASED SOCIALIST programs!! >=(

[vicko77]

I am not going to argue with you now through hundreds of comments. :) To beat someone cos pissing you off is wrong whatever the situation, BUT to beat someone in selfdefence is NOT wrong. If someone steals a bread and is starving, its NOT wrong. Everything is relative. Right? I dont care what you judge, for me is not wrong 2 stop FOETUS 2 develop if you are going 2 give birth 2 a child with a man you dont love 4 example. It is YOUR choice. Anyway,a foetus is not a human being yet. Lot of love!

[PsychoticSpasm]

EXACLTY!!!!

I could choose to beat my wife, because I decide shes pissing me off, it doesnt make it right!!! Im not arguing whether or not u have a choice, Im arguing that ending a life becuase u decide to label it as to what relieves your concense is still wrong. When people shoplift, they do the same thing "They have insurance" "they can afford it" "They have more money than me"

ITS STILL WRONG!!!!

[vicko77]

no, but humans we have a bit of consciousness and we can DECIDE what we want and what we dont want. Just like using contraception pills, also we can decide in early stage whether we leave this baby be born or not. Better not to say "a baby", in third week it is only "a foetus".

[PsychoticSpasm]

yes perfectly normal, so normal, in fact, my cat just did one to herself, with a coat hanger. Its just a part of nature. All Gods creatures kill their own unborn. Its just part of life...

[vicko77]

surely to abort a baby is a normal thing. If u disagree with the abortion totally, then I disagree with you.

[PsychoticSpasm]

Psychologists!?!?!?

Therapists?!?!? Thats who u leave the sanctity of life up to? They come up with a system based on what they can study, so u just accept it. This is why there is no maral, in the country, this is why theres so much crime, stds, ignorance, and madness. NOBODY HAS ANY STANDARDS, DICIPLINE, NOTHING IS SACRED, LIFE IS JUST ONE BIG SHOPPING SPREE, FUCK EVERYTHING ELSE....

[vicko77]

its easy. surely not 2 weeks. it is about 12 weeks confirmed by psychologists, that the foetus starts to have brain evolved enough that the foetus could be considered as a human being.. simply, there is the line where the foetus's brain starts to work individually. so it is about 3-4 months, somewhere there. i dont know exactly, you can ask doctors and scientists. if it was a rape or a incest, even in 7 mth is abortion NOT ok, cos it is already a human being evolved even if in a womb,but human.