Is the Flying Spaghetti Monster a Valid Comparison to God?
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (159)
-
@Mikeyade Come on, where's your third law of thermodynamics now? LOL
When a universe experiences heat death, what does it physically do? It shrinks. And shrinks. And it shrinks some more. This is the source of the singularity. Wow. Simple, if you follow logic to it's eventual conclusion. Luckily, it's still expanding so we have at least 14000000000 years left.
So there a start, but it makes for an infinite and ever changing universe. No god needed either.
-
@gvman3670 No. The origin of the universe is not something we can ever "know" because the laws of science only apply to the universe. We can't go back to "before" the Big Bang, nor can we ever know what transpired before it. If the matter that spewed out after the Big Bang existed as a singularity, we will never know what created this singularity, or if it existed infinitely before it. To say that "we will eventually discover the origin of the universe" is ridiculous.
-
@Mikeyade You claiming it's "unklynowable" is actually unknowable. LOL
Honestly, if we don't destroy ourselves in the next 100 years we will know the origin of the universe and all religions will be gone, except for perhaps isolated pockets amongst uneducated peoples.
-
Furthermore, we are unable to verify if the universe has existed for an infinite period of time. Anyone who spends energy on being an "atheist" or "theist" is an idiot. The question of the universe's origin is a problem that our minds will never be able to tackle. Focus on something positive like the Categorical Imperative and live in accordance with it.
Atheists: you're just as idiotic as theists because your stance resides on the polar opposite of the spectrum of the unknowable.
-
The comparison is illogical when one is thinking of "God" as the only possible alternative to the "universe that has existed for an infinite period of time" and nothing more. The error is when one goes beyond this assessment and tries to speak of the actual being, and begins to arbitrarily assign qualities to it.
Either the universe has existed for an infinite period of time or it has not. If not, then something created it.
The FSM argument exists for people who do not understand the problem.
-
Atleast I can touch a plate of speghetti and meatballs....thats more proof then anyone has ever had for their Gods.
ROFL
-
@ndrthrdr1 Deep down, Christians are as atheist as I am.
I totally agree. The way christians go around proselytizing and pushing their faith i see what's called: an affirmation of doubt. Deep down they really don't believe their mythology. So, they try to convince others in an attempt to make themselves convinced.
-
@theshredator although i lol'd please stop using fsm for any spit of violence.
-
"... not comparable, since god is defined an all powerful..." (around 0:20)
Well, I haven't seen the spaghetti monster, I have not seen his miracles, nor have I seen his power, but just how does that set me apart from any other mainstream religion?? hehe
I think it's quite comparable, as I use no less evidence to believe in him that others do in order to believe in other gods :-D
"The FSM is less of an asshole" lol
All non-believers will boil in marinara for eternity for worshiping false gods. The fool hath saithed in is his stomach "there is no spaghetti!" There will be no angelhair of mercy for all fusilli nonbelievers! Not unless you re-penne for all your sins. The FSM told me so. Get ready to meet your macaroni! =D
theshredator 3 years ago 38
RAMEN, truely his noodly appendage is with u!
RavenBlaze 2 years ago 7