@indiasrainbow He beaten a Benneton. He didn't beat Schumacher but Herbert he beaten by 9 tenths. Mansell's pole was 1.16.179 and Schumacher's time was 1.16.197. Schumacher is so fast, managed to match the fastest car despite his inferior Bennetton.
@forsoup 94,95 his car was inferior to Williams. In 96,97,98 Ferrari was shit but still he drove amazingly. In 99 he broke his leg. 2000 the car was roughly in same league as Mclaren. In the following years, the cars was the best, and by miles in some years. 2005 Bridgestone was horrible and 2006 he lost the tittle because of a broken engine, in a year which Renault was the best car for the first part and Ferrari became the best in the last GPs.
@forsoup you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
.
the '94 williams renault was miles ahead of the benetton for in terms of power, and maybe handling as well. why do you think benetton switched to renault engines in '95? schumacher won in shitty cars, and that's why pricks like you hate him.
because pussy damon hill couldn't win the championship until schumacher got into a really shitty ferrari.
@forsoup you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
.
the '94 williams renault was miles ahead of the benetton for in terms of power, and maybe handling as well. why do you think benetton switched to renault engines in '95? schumacher won in shitty cars, and that's why pricks like you hate him.
because pussy damon hill couldn't win the championship until schumacher got into a really shitty ferrari.
@gold333 The williams had a better engine but the Benetton handled better... and especially with the illegal traction control software found on the car
Super Danke
FormulaLtd 1 month ago
@indiasrainbow He beaten a Benneton. He didn't beat Schumacher but Herbert he beaten by 9 tenths. Mansell's pole was 1.16.179 and Schumacher's time was 1.16.197. Schumacher is so fast, managed to match the fastest car despite his inferior Bennetton.
arturcraft2 2 months ago
@flipsidedogchop Williams still had more downfoce.
arturcraft2 2 months ago
@forsoup 94,95 his car was inferior to Williams. In 96,97,98 Ferrari was shit but still he drove amazingly. In 99 he broke his leg. 2000 the car was roughly in same league as Mclaren. In the following years, the cars was the best, and by miles in some years. 2005 Bridgestone was horrible and 2006 he lost the tittle because of a broken engine, in a year which Renault was the best car for the first part and Ferrari became the best in the last GPs.
PS: 91,92,93 mighty drives from Schumi
arturcraft2 2 months ago
@forsoup you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
.
the '94 williams renault was miles ahead of the benetton for in terms of power, and maybe handling as well. why do you think benetton switched to renault engines in '95? schumacher won in shitty cars, and that's why pricks like you hate him.
because pussy damon hill couldn't win the championship until schumacher got into a really shitty ferrari.
ZamolxisReborn 5 months ago
@forsoup you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
.
the '94 williams renault was miles ahead of the benetton for in terms of power, and maybe handling as well. why do you think benetton switched to renault engines in '95? schumacher won in shitty cars, and that's why pricks like you hate him.
because pussy damon hill couldn't win the championship until schumacher got into a really shitty ferrari.
ZamolxisReborn 5 months ago
@forsoup suzuka 2000? did he crack there? i think we both know the answer to that
f1baker 8 months ago
Schumacher and his cheating Benneton. He shit himself every time he was under any pressure.
Adelaide 94, Jerez 97. He won titles in cars that were miles ahead of the rest of the pack, but lost every time he was in a real battle.
A good driver, but no legend. Especially in 94.
forsoup 8 months ago
@gold333 The williams had a better engine but the Benetton handled better... and especially with the illegal traction control software found on the car
flipsidedogchop 9 months ago
I was there
urinayte 10 months ago