Canon EF 100-400 L estensione - extension

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
92,226
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 14, 2009

Canon EF 100-400 Extension

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 25 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (giby76)

  • Bello cavolo, anche io volevo farci un pensierino su questo ma infine ho deciso per il 70 - 200 f4 per l'uso che ne faccio...

    Questo com'è ??

  • @cornedese Secondo me un'ottica riuscita bene, ha tutto, velocità af, buona escursione focale, discreto stabilizzatore e ottima resistenza ai flare.

  • @giby76 Discreto stabilizzatore? non va benissimo?

  • @cornedese Diciamo che essendo un ottica datata (se nn sbaglio è stata progettata circa 16 anni fa), lo stabilizzatore non è paragonabile a quelli che si trovano sulle ultime ottiche Canon serie L. Comunque il suo lavoro lo fa :).

  • scs ma quanto costa??

  • @SS97A dipende dal negozio, diciamo che il prezzo varia dai 1300 ai 1500 € ..

    ciao!

Top Comments

  • i have had one 2 years and use all the time, never had any dust inside. you must have a faulty one.

see all

All Comments (36)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • that's an ugly lens.

  • @Femidio1

    Agree

  • i want it!

  • @cpcrame it's a nikon for blacks

  • that's a mighty long extender...do you use it to fuck a black hoe?

  • I'm either not going to use my lens hood or i will paint it to match.

  • @beastyfourpointsix  70-200 for sure...

    but shouldn't you have known that seeing as you own a 5Dmk2?

  • FUCK ME I REALLY WANT THIS ONE !! :D

  • @stevegek easy fella! im going on experiance ! moved from canon to nikon and never been happier, but its the eye behind the gear thats vital! cheer up!

  • @quickshooter100 You Sir, are the reason I hate photographers in general. "Ohhh my brand is way cooler, I won't give any proper arguments I'll just bash".

    Had Nikon, various cams. Had Canon, a lot more cams, had this lens and about 8 more L lenses... loved Canon.This lens did not generate any dust just like with my 28-300.

  • Go strait for the 400MM 2.8, the 100-400 has a tough time with sharp images unless it is bright day light to produce sharp images. I tried to self rationalize for almost a year until I got the 300 and 400 Primes.

  • @beastyfourpointsix

    70-200 2.8

  • @ModulatedSignal what's a bikon

  • one big dust pump! nikon all the way!

  • This is a great lens for shooting outdoor field and extreme sports and occasionally nature photography.

  • @knarleysurfer54

    That's not that big, look at the L primes for big.

  • Hmmm, I have one as well, about 6 months, no dust at all. Not like the dust will show up in the pic anyway.

  • one big problem... the push-pull zoom sucks dust! I have one, in one month I could see all the dust inside. And I'm very carefull when using it.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more