Tree of Life video HD

How does one calculate the odds of something that we still don't know how it happened or is supposed to happen?

You're talking about abiogenesis, not evolution. If your hypothesis is that an outside force seeded the earth with self-replicating micro-organisms, that's fine, but that still doesn't make evolution less true.

Many Scientists R not convinced at all about abiogenesis & evolution's faith in CHANCE. Faith indeed it is, when the odds are calculated, and the insurmountable chain of digits jump from the pages, there in black & white. It makes Faith in Christianity seem quite rational in comparison. Do the research, look up works by Sir Fred Hoyle, Douglas Axe, Robert Sauer among others.
The problem is combinatorial, & its is a problem that will only get bigger as nuclear biologists further reduce the cell

these odds are astonishingly, infinitely, ridiculously,
small. There is no way , no how, no possibility, that chance brought about all the variables to the perfect time and place for this event to take place. If you believe it did, you need to go to Vegas, you may be a "trillonare" and do not even know it. Because the odds for non-life to jump to life as biogenesis proclaims are 1 in the trillions, trillions, trillions, trillons, (not enough space to keep going) I think you get the point.

Professing to be wise, they became fools.(romans 1:22)

@lmrodriguezr This is not a good video, it is a rather lousy video. It takes many assumptions, and disregards some very serious questions. such as origin of life. How did that start? how did life came to be from non-life? It says life began in the sea? that's a new one to me. It ignores the fact that the "tree" is missing a lot of branches(links). Look up the Cambrian explosion and its problems for evolution,(there are no distinct evolutionary precursors for this event).

It also doesn't talk about gravity, how my chair was made or how tap-dancing is linked with porridge.

You are just as much of an idiot as those that ask what the evolutionary theory has to say on the origins of life when that is the field of abiogenesis.

Oh wait thats exactly what you were talking about, never mind.

abiogenesis & evolution walk hand in hand, you need the first to have the second. Abiogenesis like Evo. contends that the first amino acids, that turned into proteins, that turned into a simple living cell HAPPENED BY CHANCE!
Thanks to nuclear biology & mathematics the odds of that happening have been calculated: 1 in 10 to the 164 power to have a functional protein (Douglas Axe). To have a functional cell: the odds are 1 in 10 to the 40 thousands, power (Sir Fred Hoyle). Do the Math
Einstein

Watch Stephen Meyer videos on YT if u have an open mind. For cutting edge science on molecular biology. Also look into Information Science and Thermodynamics regarding how these two fairly new Sciences contradict the evolutionary theory. New technology has been able to uncover irreducible complex systems , which Darwin himself worried would debunk his theory. Such systems exist and Evo does not have any answers & as consequence it is slowly loosing its foothold, dominion, and credibility.

look up the miller-urey experiment 1953..... proved that in primordial conditions, complex organic molecules can, in fact, spontaneously appear.

And no, the theory of evolution is in no way associated with the beginning of life......you're confusion it with something entirely different.