Free Tlbet, Save Tlbet : Tokyo, 6 May,2008

http://www.ohmynews.co.jp/news/20080502/24429
Free Tlbet: Tokyo, 6 May,2008

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Hu
• Jintao
• Japan
• Totyo
• Free
• Tibet
• Darfur
• Burma
• Jacques
• Rogge
• Protest
• Olympic
• torch
• Communist
• China
• human
• rights
• violator

[hideBiska]

I'm proud of them.

I wish TIBET's FREE

[sashay34]

This might seem a small step but significant step for a big change for Tibet.

[JJJGGG888]

It is not translated well too. Please write by the short text. It is the moral essential principles which China should study of keeping not ideology but law, protecting a contract, and not carrying out abuse.

There is an official document in 1922 of the Communist Party of China.

... It is the Chinese federation whom we aim at. The Chinese federation is led by the Han race, and each race of Tibet, Mongolian, and a Uighur of subscription or secession is free in the Chinese federation.

[terrycheung07]

HOwever, I know that IN the world , there are always a group of anti-chinese people, will do whatever they can to against china, tibet? olympic? they dun care, they care whether it can be used as an excuse to implement some ani-china activity which is very sad. we should jugde by fact , not by race! IN the case of fact, China did do something wrong, but which country nowaday can standout and say they are perfect? they have 100% clean history? there are some , but not USA, not Japan either

[terrycheung07]

I am not a native english speaker, I am trying my best here, and I do apologize for the inconvience. I personally think CHina is learning western modernization , In economically , they are more open to the world, (moret than JP), with constitutional, you cannot expect it will change just like that! We dun have to fully follow the western ideology , moreover, IT doent mean if china doesnt follow that ideology, they have to free tibet, or any city in china, this is not the rule of the game.

[JJJGGG888]

I am using web translation. Please write the text which is easy to be translated without using an abbreviation. Your text is hard to be translated. That it was a colony in Japan, also in a Korean annexation, all settlement of the Japanese to Manchuria also observed international law, and Taiwan was performed. It is the big difference from China. And it is not imperialism but the modernization and the constitutional government principle which China should learn from the west side.

[terrycheung07]

In the case of nowadays, which country is not selfish? which country does not want more land and resource? I mean japan did it as well, it fail to do so becasue of United States, or Aiasn may be colonize by Japan unitil today! other countries has right to riase out thier voice, but in my opinion , not Japan, not USA. we all know the rule of the game. Stonger will eat the weaker. Chinese people has learned it very deeply in the past.

[terrycheung07]

so you are trying to saying there a relationship between japan imperial family and korea? I dun know, i never heard abt it, so I wont agrue wif you, but There a group of chinese people , stay at the north of China, around 15000-20000 people, they language is korean, and second language is Chinese, In history, there are much more interaction between China and korea, because Korea is contentially connect to china, but it does not give an excuse to colonize them , does it?

[terrycheung07]

ok, if you study chinese history, Tibet uigur and south mongolian were part of china for the past thousand of YRs. Ok , let s say they are not part of us, we occupate them, Japan were trying to do that to Taiwan, south korea and also China, the different is we did not defeated by USA. My point is, raise out your voice to china, ok, no problem, but make sure your country history are ''clear'', and better be, In this case , when you llok at what USA did recenlty and Japan did in the past, well

[JJJGGG888]

If Korea is a colony, does the Imperial Family of Japan which is a suzerain have marital relation? There were a time, and the Korean Diet member and Korean mayor who were merged, and the Japanese subordinate was. A duty of Korean study was imposed upon the Japanese who lives in Korea. There were a Korean newspaper and a movie. Is this a figure of a colony? And as for Japan's case of Taiwan, the case of Korea was also in the red.

[JJJGGG888]

The international status of present Taiwan approaches a U.S. defect.

Deep friendship exists between Japanese and the Taiwanese even now.

Korea was merged into Japan although there was a dissenting opinion in Japan in the case of Korea. This annexation is also filling international law and the blessing of international society was received. Moreover, the Korean Imperial Family connected marital relation to the Japanese Imperial Family.

[JJJGGG888]

No, China invaded neighboring countries, as soon as Japan was defeated. They are Tibet, Uigur, and south Mongolian. Probably, the west side was busy with the re-invasion to Asia. Taiwan became a colony in Japan lawfully by the Sino-Japanese War, and became an occupation zone in the United States by defeat of Japan, and government was entrusted to it by the United States in Chinese Nationalist Party. The Taiwanese experienced the longest martial law in the world by Chinese Nationalist Party.