911 Watermark; Pointless Triangles

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,472
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 21, 2009

NBC showed us this sequence just before 9:00am on September 11, 2001. At first glance, one might assume that the pointless triangles are lens glare. But, of course, we see that the pointless triangles are fixed on the lens and do not change at all when the camera's angle with regard to the sun changes. I think they look remarkably like incomplete pyramids. Every perp has a signature.

For extra interest, please note that the sequence is from the west side of the twins and the camera appears level with the damaged floors. Obviously a chopper shot from somewhere over NJ with a super zoom lens.

But, I wonder...

How often is a camera mounted on a tripod in a chopper? Is that a special wescam feature?

From the original NBC archived mpeg no longer available at archive, so the whole world will know.

  • likes, 11 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • all tv channels and tv stations were using images broadcasted from 1 control room controld by the US government in 9/11

  • youroom101

    no I'm not joking at all.

    I've read all your comments and as you see by my comment I've not attacked you directly,I've used the generic words "slow brains".

    Anyway only a video response made by you with your hands would be useful for a real discussion.

    Reproduce that effect,then we can speak.

    I quote your words :

    "only a camera and a bright object is"(needed)

    ,well,thus it will be an easy task for you.

see all

All Comments (69)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @lqdust Thanks for your comment.

    They are just pointless!

    Me and my arrow!

  • @jalderwood you're actualy wrong on that. i watched your little Star Trek video too. Lense flares would move and change shape as the camera moved. idk what it is but it's not a lense flare.

  • @jalderwood Thanks for your comment.

    A wager, you say? I'm game.

    Bet you can't find a non-trivial error that has not already been found in any of my videos proving that the media presented fakes on 911.

    ps, 188 videos at about 3 minutes ave each suggests a lot of research. Have you been thru the NIST and FEMA reports that use falsified images? I have.

  • @CNN911Fakes "Very different" in what sense? Because they don't look like the usual film camera lens flare? They move and look just like the real thing. Rather than say CNN doctored or produced these images digitally (a lot of effort for such a short piece of film that shows nothing), I wager the triangle shaped flare you see is a factor of the camera or lens. Why don't you do some more research rather than jumping to conclusions. p.s. what is the drawing you're talking about?

  • @jalderwood Thanks for that example.

    These are very different, I think you know that.

  • @CNN911Fakes my assertion would be ?v=hiAToA3qZcI

    as you said they're a drawing. otherwise i'd suggest the triangular flare was a factor of the lens.

  • @jalderwood Please demonstrate your assertion withexamples from YT.

    In fact, they are part of a drawing.

  • It's a lens flare, jackass.

  • check out 9/11 WESCAM

  • i live in queens, my gf at the time worked uptown, my mother worked ACROSS THE STREET, and they all saw it. I was at the hospital picking up my grandfather that day.. standing in the parking lot at the hospital IN QUEENS, i could see the smoke billowing from the towers in the sky. anyone who thinks it didn't actually happen and that everything was faked is in need of some serious psychological counseling.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more