2004 NBA Finals: Pistons at Lakers, Gm 2 part 15/15
Loading...
6,680
Loading...
Top Comments
see all
All Comments (23)
-
WHAT A DEFENSE BY SHAQ! :D
-
This was the best game the lakers had in the whole series they should of won it in 04 but we fell short. Darn it lol! I was in 8th grade.
-
@MrSlik25 LA lost cause Malone was injured, plus Kobe was exhausted by the end of the playoffs. Not to mention, of course, the Kobe-Shaq feud.
-
Shaqs last home laker game :/
-
@sravalm21 your stupid, no way this pistons was ever getting swept this year
-
@MrSlik25 duh
-
kobe forever
Loading...
It is wrong to say the Lakers "should have won this series". The reason they didn't win it is because they were up against a superior defensive team (With the addition of Rasheed Wallace they eventually became one of the best defensive teams in NBA history in my opinion.) Also the fact that the Pistons had offensive weapons from many different players including some players on the bench. Not just 2 or 3. Pistons were the younger, more athletic and just better team.
DepressedYoungMan 1 year ago 12
the lakers roster was flawed, got rid of horry, fisher was hurt, and clowns like slava, kareem rush and gary payton were getting PT, THE TEAM WAS CREATED SIMILAR TO THE MIAMI HEAT. BAD ROLE PLAYERS
redskins2k 1 year ago 2