At the Line: E-Collar I

WaterDog TV's Justin Tackett demonstrates how to collar-train your dog so he associates the e-collar with the positive parts of training and hunting first.

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• ducks
• unlimited
• waterdog
• tackett
• dog
• training
• retriever
• waterfowl
• hunting
• e-collar
• tips

[sn3ax]

If your dog doesn't listen to you without a choke or e then ur a pretty crappy dog owner and should not be allowed to have a dog.

[chuntoon01]

"condition" is the word he uses, I use 'correct' or use 'corrections'. What we mean is the same thing, you don't use the collar to TEACH anything, you use it to reinforce it. The dog knows the command & then you 'proof' (its another word dog people use) the dog by giving it corrections or conditioning when it doesn't obey.

listen I've repeated myself several different ways. If you still don't get it to bad!!

[chuntoon01]

2:20 he reminds you again "Now remember, you dog already knows sit", at 3:50, he says AGAIN, "remember you don't start this till you dog knows what sit is"

[chuntoon01]

In the video, the guy teaches the dog to 'sit' long before the choke or shock collar is put on to it. He says, several times & in several ways, teach your dog the command before you 'condition' the dog. At 0:50, he says it, "you must teach you dog basic obedience then...", at 2:00 he says "remember before we start any kind of condition we need to have gone through the for a couple of weeks, like basic obedience, chasing the bumper....",

[chuntoon01]

BBBAHAHAHAHAHA

talk about grammar ... wtf is that mess you sent me?!

The original comment I responded to, the person said "I used the electric collar to TEACH my dog 'heel'", the commenter had nothing to do with the video or the dog in it.

In your response to my comment, you said the dog in the video was fine or unhurt. I agree completely and had no problem with the video or the trainer or dog in it.

[chuntoon01]

not only did I revise it, I even labeled it

a)

b)

c)

again so that a 5 year old could understand that I was repeating the same points.

Clearly anyone who states "i think its ridulis for ppl to insult spelling and grammer on youtube" and then goes on to insult my grammar...isn't the brightest bulb

again, personal attacks just prove you have no more valid arguments to make && good luck electrocuting your dog,,I'll be the guy with the positively trained dog winning the agility trials

[alion06]

obviously my grammer is readable as aposed to yours. i think its ridulis for ppl to insult spelling and grammer on youtube. but i cudnt understand wtf u were saying. and i was simply comenting that i cudnt understand what it sed and asked you to revise it which u didnt. proly meaning u did look at it and saw how ludacris your claims and argument was and was to embarassed to resend your shitty comment

[chuntoon01]

well, when your limited by the character count,,you try and find a way to get your point without referring to the 'hooked on phonics' books .. not that your grammar OR spelling has been good...so its funny you'd say that

but personal attacks are the last refuge of people who've been proven wrong on utube. Good luck w/ that!!

[alion06]

i understand ppl not worrying about spelling. but basic grammer wouuld be helpful i mean good god

[chuntoon01]

.....what does the "e" in e-collar stand for then?

.....when you shock someone/thing with electricity what are you doing to them?

my pup is 5 months old, responds 100% of the time and has NEVER had a choke, pinch or shock collar on

nor do a large % of the dogs who win obedience, herding, hunting , or tracking trails.

I rescued an aggressive dog and found a place for training collars, but its just the lazy mans tool & above all, the original point I made, its for corrections not teaching