@cabbageboy101 What i'm trying to say is that xp is an ancient obsolete OS with tons of security loopholes and problems. I always had programs Not Responding in xp, but never with vista. Vista used way more ram, but 1gb was enough to get by with aero disabled. And i had the ultimate version installed, home basic or home premium would run a lot better. Microsoft doesn't even support xp, but they still support vista and 7. In the end, just use 7
@psychoclown420 yes but there are so many unnecessary processes and "services" that it really prevents the computer from running at it's full potential. and yes, vista is much better for security, but you're much better off just disabling all of the security services and installing free antivirus software (like avast. avast provides real-time shields that scan every single file that you open and program that you run). so on a large scale, if you install that in xp, it would be better than vista
@cabbageboy101 I had more problems with XP than vista. First, vista takes advantage of multiple logical processors, therefore a single core atom with hyperthreading performs like a straight-up single core in XP whereas vista takes advantage of the virtual core, aiding in performance. Also xp is guaranteed to get a virus no matter what. Vista is much better for security. Finally, if you run 32 bit in basic theme and disable unnecessary services, it will run much better.
@quinillo94 The vid was shot way before windows 7 was released. True, Vista too heavy for that machine (seems it's the eepc 900). But the factory OS? If it's that crappy Xandros linux Asus installed on those early eee's... definitely NOT!!! It f****** sucks!!!! Either XP or a SERIOUS linux distro (XANDROS= toy linux).
@psychoclown420 um ok but you didn't even mention windows 7. anyway ya ur right
cabbageboy101 10 months ago
@cabbageboy101 What i'm trying to say is that xp is an ancient obsolete OS with tons of security loopholes and problems. I always had programs Not Responding in xp, but never with vista. Vista used way more ram, but 1gb was enough to get by with aero disabled. And i had the ultimate version installed, home basic or home premium would run a lot better. Microsoft doesn't even support xp, but they still support vista and 7. In the end, just use 7
psychoclown420 10 months ago
@psychoclown420 yes but there are so many unnecessary processes and "services" that it really prevents the computer from running at it's full potential. and yes, vista is much better for security, but you're much better off just disabling all of the security services and installing free antivirus software (like avast. avast provides real-time shields that scan every single file that you open and program that you run). so on a large scale, if you install that in xp, it would be better than vista
cabbageboy101 10 months ago
@cabbageboy101 I had more problems with XP than vista. First, vista takes advantage of multiple logical processors, therefore a single core atom with hyperthreading performs like a straight-up single core in XP whereas vista takes advantage of the virtual core, aiding in performance. Also xp is guaranteed to get a virus no matter what. Vista is much better for security. Finally, if you run 32 bit in basic theme and disable unnecessary services, it will run much better.
psychoclown420 10 months ago
@kuyajhet DON'T INSTALL VISTA xp is a LOT better for netbooks. in fact, xp is probably better than vista for ALL computers
cabbageboy101 10 months ago
@quinillo94 The vid was shot way before windows 7 was released. True, Vista too heavy for that machine (seems it's the eepc 900). But the factory OS? If it's that crappy Xandros linux Asus installed on those early eee's... definitely NOT!!! It f****** sucks!!!! Either XP or a SERIOUS linux distro (XANDROS= toy linux).
BilisNegra 11 months ago
what drivers are you using in your internet adapters?
kuyajhet 1 year ago
can you give me some tips where can i install the vista because it has a 4 partitions and it says i cant use those hard disk. pls help me anyone:(
kuyajhet 1 year ago
@thomickcz Obviously LInux would run better, even the latest version of Linux can run on a 486, not fast, but will run.
talldude123 1 year ago
If the computer came with xp and you upgraded to vista, you're StUpaAd
Vaderfan0307 1 year ago