Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Condoleezza Rice Empower women Protect innocents $ bail-out

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
5,446
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 25, 2008

Rice for President - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rice-for-president/
For Freedom Forums - http://figh.tk
Peter Dow's website - http://scot.tk
The BBC's Jeremy Paxman interviews the US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, September 25, 2008.


Empowering women.

Gellman 'tears' not true.

Relationship with Donald Rumsfeld.
National Security advisor. Sometimes not easy bringing people together.

Judgement of History on Bush administration.

War on terror and protecting innocents from evil men.

Democratic capitalism and the financial crisis. Finding a solution for ordinary Americans.

Partial Transcript -
"Well you know I don't know any good alternative to democratic capitalism. Let's remember what happened to the Soviet Union and its attempts to plan everything from above.
Look there are, we do have a financial crisis and the president spoke last night to the need to address it and to address it at its root causes and there will be plenty of time later to examine why this happened
but right now the President, my colleague Hank Paulson, the Fed chairman Ben Bernanke are working with Congressional leaders as we speak to find a solution to this crisis so that this does not become a problem for ordinary Americans - that is the key.
But let's remember that this is also an economic system that is responsible for many of the advances in the world, whether they are medical, whether they are through information technology, whether they are the advances that allow men and women to come from modest circumstances to better themselves - this is a system that's responsible for that and when you ask yourself 'What is the alternative?' I don't think there is one."

-------
60 plus more Condi videos by this author on YouTube -
http://www.youtube.com/groups_videos?name=dowforcondi

Rice for President Yahoo Group -
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Rice-for-President/
- for supporters of Condi

Comments posted on this condiTV page MUST NOT be anti-Condi because they will be removed!

However, Condistas are all for free speech, so if you've something more robust or critical to say then please take it to -

CONDI GROUP on YouTube -
"Condi videos of all kinds. Condi in the news. Secretary of State. Draft Condi 2008. Funny or hard-hitting satire or impressions. Or even just video or audio discussing something that Condi talks about a lot - like "What should our Iraq strategy be?"
http://www.youtube.com/group/condi

Or

Discuss on the For Freedom Forum
http://scot.bravehost.com/youtubecomment.htm

All videos by Peter Dow -
http://www.youtube.com/groups_videos?name=peterdowtv

  • likes, 5 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (CondiTV1)

  • She's solid and well poised...she has a light and very inspiring.

  • prosperabovehaters - What did you think of the interviewer, Jeremy Paxman?

    I ask because some other comments here don't like him and you said

    "this interviewer sucks!" about another BBC interviewer, a woman, as a comment to dumppalin's video

    "Condoleezza Rice on Sarah Palin's experience. With subtitles"

    watch?v=fcZ_VDScvj0

    Is he better than the BBC woman in the other Condi interview, or no better, and why?

  • It's rather insulting for him to make such a big deal over her being a female.

  • liveleakisbetter - Was he? Explain.

    To my eyes as a republican Briton, whose unwelcome monarch as head of state, has been a woman, the Queen, and whose Prime Minister for 10 years was a woman, (whom I hated as I'm left-wing socialist and Thatcher a conservative) - but never have I questioned them being female as a "big deal".

    Why did Americans choose the light-weight Bush as President and the towering intellect of Rice as only Secretary of State? Sex? Colour? There must be a reason.

  • I agree that being a female in politics is a big deal, but by constantly bringing the topic back to gender he's blocking her out of main road political discussion and putting her into a subcategory not of her choosing.

  • liveleakisbetter - No you don't agree with me - you misunderstood my comment above.

    I do not think being a female in politics is a big deal.

    No Briton does these days. Not with Queen Elizabeth and after Thatcher.

    Female politicians are expected IN BRITAIN, the norm.

    I still want to ask America, WHY is it a big deal to have a woman in charge?

    When Condi is the best, of all men and women, how dare Americans pat themselves on the back for choosing a black candidate (Obama)?

  • liveleakisbetter - And if the Americans had elected Hillary Clinton as president I would have scolded them on similar grounds -

    "When Condi is the best, of all blacks and whites, how dare Americans pat themselves on the back for choosing a woman candidate (Hillary)"

    I HATE putting people into categories, I am just fuming that the Americans have not chosen the best person of all and they dare to think have been Politically Correct enough to excuse their failure to draft Condi.

    SHAME!

Video Responses

see all

All Comments (14)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I love this lady

  • If there was more women on the power there would'nt be so many wars in the world.

    But it is the women there have to do something about it.

    most women think that politicc an econemy and all that kind of things is men stuff but it's not women have to be ambitius.

  • More women in power, yes! Our world will be better place when we have women among men in power!!!

  • i think he has a sharp tongue but was very respectful and let her speak...and she handled his questions very well as usual. She's inspiring, and this is coming from a guy.

  • prosperabovehaters - Exactly, that is what I have trying to explain to Americans for the past 4 years since I started running Rice for President Yahoo Group.

    And now the Americans are sending this most remarkable person off the world stage back to relative obscurity back to Stanford.

    Don't you people (Americans generally) realise who you have there?

    What's Obama going to do - just leave her there in the background? SHAME ON HIM!

    Rice for President 2012!

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more